11 U.S.C. § 1185
Removal of debtor in possession
Section effective 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: Dusan Pittner, No. 21-11009 (Bankr. D. Mass. Feb. 4, 2022).
Dusan Pittner, No. 21-11009 (Bankr. D. Mass. Feb. 4, 2022). “After a video hearing, the Court, finding cause to convert or dismiss, but also finding that removal of the Debtor from possession pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (a) is in the best interest of creditors and the estate, shall remove the Debtor from possession based on the Debtor’s…”
Moore & Moore Trucking, LLC, No. 20-10925 (Bankr. E.D. La. Jan. 12, 2022). “115, 166 & 172]; and the opposition to that motion, as supplemented, filed by the Debtor, [ECF Docs.”
Neosho Concrete Prods. Co., No. 20-30314 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. May 6, 2021). “Alternatively, the UST argues cause exists to remove Neosho as debtor in possession under 11 U.S.C. § 1185 because Neosho allegedly made preferential transfers to an insider during the preference period.”
Cinemex Holdings USA, Inc., No. 25-17559 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Aug. 28, 2025). “Having considered the statutory framework of Subchapter V, the Court finds that guidance comes from the provisions relating to the expansion of a Subchapter V trustee’s duties pursuant to section 1183(b)(2) and the provisions addressing the extreme circumstances of removal of a…”
In Re: Coeptis Equity Fund LLC v. Janina Hoskins, No. 23-60001 (9th Cir. Mar. 15, 2024). “Coeptis contends that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion when it issued the Removal Order because 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (a) provides that a debtor may be removed as DIP upon the motion of a party in interest, and the bankruptcy court removed Coeptis as DIP on its own motion.”
Green v. Nosek, No. 0:22-cv-00972 (D. Minn. Nov. 10, 2022). “] After possession of the properties was turned over to Schuldner, the United States Trustee filed a motion seeking to again remove the debtor from possession of the property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1185 and appoint the subchapter 7 trustee to assume the debtor’s duties.”
California Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. v. United States Tr., No. 4:22-cv-00812 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2023). “A week after Appellants filed for bankruptcy, Pender Capital “moved for automatic relief from the automatic stay to allow it to evict [CPARC]” and sought either an “appointment of a trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (a) or conversion of Appellants’ case to one under Chapter 7, to…”
Nat'l Small Bus. All., Inc., No. 21-00031 (Bankr. D.D.C. June 29, 2022). “See 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (“On request of a party in interest, and after notice and a hearing, the court shall order that the debtor shall not be a debtor in possession for cause, including fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, or gross mismanagement of the affairs of the debtor, either…”
ComedyMX LLC, No. 22-11181 (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 16, 2022). “Section 1184 makes plain that a debtor in possession in a subchapter V case is required to “perform [the] function and duties … 23 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (a). 24 11 U.S.C. § 102 (3).”
Corinthian Commc'ns, Inc., No. 22-10425 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2022). “(the “Debtor”), as the debtor in possession pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (a). The Subchapter V Trustee in this Subchapter V Chapter 11 case, Eric Huebscher, filed a declaration in support of the Motion.”
USA Cricket, No. 25-16381 (Bankr. D. Colo. Dec. 15, 2025). “30 11 U.S.C. § 1185 (a). 31 11 U.S.C. §§ 1183 (b)(5) & (b)(7).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.