11 U.S.C. § 1195

Transactions with professionals

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding section 327(a) of this title, a person is not disqualified for employment under section 327 of this title, by a debtor solely because that person holds a claim of less than $10,000 that arose prior to commencement of the case.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case: Fatih Ozcelebi (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2021).
Fatih Ozcelebi (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2021). · cites it 4× “’s objections that the $9,999 is nothing more than a general unsecured claim which is likely 1 11 U.S.C. § 1195 . avoidable as section 547 preference; and that the entire amount of $69,394.”
Par 5 Prop. Investments, LLC (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2× “” 11 U.S.C. § 1195 . But 13 the SBRA did not alter Rule 2014(a)’s duty of disclosure as to “all of 14 the person’s connections with the debtor.”
Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2020). “But “[t]he overall purpose and function of the Bankruptcy Code is to strike a balance between creditor protection and debtor relief.”
Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' Dist. Council Pension Plan v. R&W Clark Constr., Inc (N.D. Ill. 2024). “at 384–86 (citing 11 U.S.C. §§ 1195 , 1189(a), 1191(b), and 1193).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.