11 U.S.C. § 1221
Filing of plan
The debtor shall file a plan not later than 90 days after the order for relief under this chapter, except that the court may extend such period if the need for an extension is attributable to circumstances for which the debtor should not justly be held accountable.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1939–2024 · leading case: Greseth v. Fed. Land Bank (In Re Greseth), 78 B.R. 936 (D. Minnesota 1987).
Greseth v. Fed. Land Bank (In Re Greseth), 78 B.R. 936 (D. Minnesota 1987). “Delinquent Tax Payments In order to obtain protection from creditors and effect a reorganization of farming operations, a chapter 12 debtor must comply with the plan requirements of 11 U.S.C. §§ 1221 , 1222. Under section 1222, the debtor must formulate a plan which provides for…”
First Sec. Bank & Trust Co. v. Vegt, 511 B.R. 567 (N.D. Iowa 2014). “First Security argues that the bankruptcy court erred in not dismissing the Debtors’ Chapter 12 case for failure to file a reorganization plan within the 90 day period required under 11 U.S.C. § 1221 . D. Analysis 1. Section 364 financing The Debtors’ Motion to Incur Secured…”
In Re Juan O. Plata, in Re Catalina Plata, Debtors. Peter H. Arkison, Tr. v. Juan O. Plata, Catalina Plata, 958 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1992). “See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1221 , 1222(a)(1), (2). 5 Confirmation of the plan submitted had several immediate effects: it bound, inter alios, Debtors as well as their creditors, see 11 U.”
United States Ex Rel. Dep't of Agric. Farm Serv. Agency v. Myers (In Re Myers), 362 F.3d 667 (10th Cir. 2004). “See 11 U.S.C. § 1221 . The bankruptcy court confirmed the plan over FSA’s objections.”
In Re Novak, 103 B.R. 403 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1989). “11 U.S.C. § 1221 . The legislative history to § 1205 indicates that Congress wanted to give the family farmer time to devote his attention to the plan, time in which he would not be diverted by satellite litigation.”
In Re Britton, 83 B.R. 914 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1988). “11 U.S.C. § 1221 . The confirmation hearing is required to be concluded within forty-five (45) days of the filing of the plan.”
In Re Bentson, 74 B.R. 56 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1987). “11 U.S.C. § 1221 (1987). A confirmation hearing was held and confirmation of the plan was denied on May 11, 1987.”
In Re Lubbers, 73 B.R. 440 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1987). “11 U.S.C. § 1221 ; Bankr. Rule 9006(b). Two days after the running of the 90-day period, the debtors filed a motion to extend time to file a plan.”
In Re Buchholz, 224 B.R. 13 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1998). “In response to debtor’s petition, on July 22, 1991, Hunterdon moved to dismiss the case for, inter alia, debtor’s failure to file a timely plan of reorganization pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1221 . A little over a week after Hunterdon filed its motion to dismiss, on August 1,1991,…”
In Re Howard, 212 B.R. 864 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1997). “3 This case was dismissed on October 15,1996, after the debtors failed to propose a plan of reorganization within 90 days as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1221 . When Associates subsequently recommenced foreclosure proceedings, the debtors retained counsel and filed the present…”
In Re Massengill, 73 B.R. 1008 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1987). “11 U.S.C. § 1221 . 2 . FmHA’s secured claim is secured by the second lien on the residence and by liens with different priorities on farm equipment.”
In re Akers, 594 B.R. 362 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2019). “" 11 U.S.C. § 1221 . The Debtor filed his Chapter 12 case over a year and a half ago on May 3, 2017, and has not yet proposed a confirmable plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.