11 U.S.C. § 1223
Modification of plan before confirmation
For repeal of section effective
Permanent reenactment of section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1987–2020 · leading case: Greseth v. Fed. Land Bank (In Re Greseth), 78 B.R. 936 (D. Minnesota 1987).
Greseth v. Fed. Land Bank (In Re Greseth), 78 B.R. 936 (D. Minnesota 1987). “Title 11 U.S.C. § 1223 (a) provides that “[tjhe debtor may modify the plan at any time before confirmation.”
In Re Stallings, 290 B.R. 777 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2003). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1223 (b). The Court therefore deems Debtors’ treatment of Creditor’s claim in the Supplement their proposed "plan” for purposes of this Decision, and will refer to the Supplement as such.”
In Re Bentson, 74 B.R. 56 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1987). “11 U.S.C. § 1223 allows a debtor to modify a plan “at any time before confirmation”.”
In Re Hyman, 82 B.R. 23 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1987). “Nor is the evidence convincing as to why the debtor did not modify his plan in the second case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1223 and Bankruptcy Rule 3019 so as to present a feasible plan for confirmation.”
In Re Rivera Sanchez, 80 B.R. 6 (Bankr. D.P.R. 1987). “Pursuant to Section 1223(a), 11 U.S.C. § 1223 (a), the debtor “may modify the plan at any time before confirmation, but may not modify the plan so that the plan as modified fails to meet the requirements of section 1222 of this title.”
Jeffrey Brooks v. First Cent. Bank McCook (8th Cir. BAP 2020). “11 U.S.C. §§ 1223 (modification of plan before confirmation) and 1229 (modification of plan after confirmation).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.