11 U.S.C. § 1224
Confirmation hearing
After expedited notice, the court shall hold a hearing on confirmation of the plan. A party in interest, the trustee, or the United States trustee may object to the confirmation of the plan. Except for cause, the hearing shall be concluded not later than 45 days after the filing of the plan.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: In Re: Nanette Sisk, 962 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2020).
In Re: Nanette Sisk, 962 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2020). “11 U.S.C. § 1224 . The presence of clear language requiring a conclusive confirmation hearing in Chapter 12 and the absence of similar language in Chapter 13 strongly indicates that courts need only hold a hearing to comply with Chapter 13 of the Code.”
Greseth v. Fed. Land Bank (In Re Greseth), 78 B.R. 936 (D. Minnesota 1987). “” Upon proposal of a plan, 11 U.S.C. § 1224 requires that “[ejxcept for cause, the [confirmation] hearing shall be concluded not later than 45 days after the filing of the plan.”
In re Pertuset, 492 B.R. 232 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2012). “See 11 U.S.C. § 1224 (requiring that “[e]xeept for cause, [a chapter 12 confirmation] hearing shall be concluded not later than 45 days after the filing of the plan.”
Haffey v. Crocker (In re Haffey), 576 B.R. 540 (6th Cir. BAP 2017). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1224 . These mandatory time periods are included so that “chapter 12 cases would be processed expeditiously by the bankruptcy courts and would not be subject to delay so often characteristic of chapter 11 cases.”
Matter of Eaton, 130 B.R. 74 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa 1991). “, 11 U.S.C. §§ 1224 , 1307(c), 327(c), 707(b), and 727(c)(1) (1991) (U.”
In Re Britton, 83 B.R. 914 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 1988). “11 U.S.C. § 1224 . These provisions of Chapter 12 are designed to benefit *921 the creditors by requiring prompt confirmation or dismissal of the case.”
In re Bennett, 283 B.R. 308 (10th Cir. BAP 2002). “2002(a)(8) and 11 U.S.C. § 1224 , mandating that a confirmation hearing be concluded within 45 days of the filing of a Chapter 12 plan, which, in the Debtors’ case, was scheduled to expire on July 27, 2000.”
In Re Pretzer, 96 B.R. 790 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1989). “In a further effort to expedite implementation of Chapter 12 plans, § 1224 [11 U.S. C. § 1224] contemplates expedited notice of a hearing on the plan and conclusion of the hearing not later than 45 days after the filing of the plan unless the time is extended for cause.”
Gordon R. Stahn v. Ray Haeckel, 920 F.2d 555 (8th Cir. 1990). “1 Under 11 U.S.C. § 1224 (1989), a confirmation hearing on the plan must be held within forty-five days after the filing.”
In re Heft, 564 B.R. 389 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2017). “11 U.S.C. § 1224 . Here, although it was timely filed, the Debtor’s original Plan was not confirmable.”
Yarnall v. Rowley (In Re Rowley), 143 B.R. 547 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1992). “5 11 U.S.C. § 1224 . Section 1225 identifies the specific requirements necessary for plan confirmation and the remaining sections address post-confirmation issues.”
In Re Roesner, 153 B.R. 328 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1993). “11 U.S.C. § 1224 . The plan “shall provide for submission of all or such portion of future earnings or other future income of the debtor to the supervision and control of the trustee as is necessary for execution of the plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.