11 U.S.C. § 1513

Access of foreign creditors to a case under this title

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Foreign creditors have the same rights regarding the commencement of, and participation in, a case under this title as domestic creditors.(b)(1) Subsection (a) does not change or codify present law as to the priority of claims under section 507 or 726, except that the claim of a foreign creditor under those sections shall not be given a lower priority than that of general unsecured claims without priority solely because the holder of such claim is a foreign creditor.(2)(A) Subsection (a) and paragraph (1) do not change or codify present law as to the allowability of foreign revenue claims or other foreign public law claims in a proceeding under this title.(B) Allowance and priority as to a foreign tax claim or other foreign public law claim shall be governed by any applicable tax treaty of the United States, under the conditions and circumstances specified therein.(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, § 801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 138.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: Charles Russell, LLP Ex Rel. Awal Bank, BSC v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (In Re Awal Bank, BSC), 455 B.R. 73 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011).
Charles Russell, LLP Ex Rel. Awal Bank, BSC v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (In Re Awal Bank, BSC), 455 B.R. 73 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011). “11 U.S.C. §§ 1513 , 1514. The principle that claims of all creditors in a foreign proceeding can and should be filed by the foreign administrator in a plenary case pending in another jurisdiction has been advocated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.