11 U.S.C. § 1523
Actions to avoid acts detrimental to creditors
Section effective 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. Litig., 458 B.R. 665 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).
In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. Litig., 458 B.R. 665 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “bankruptcy case within its Chapter 15 case, 11 U.S.C. § 1523 , the bankruptcy court acts as an ancillary court, applying only foreign law with “no opportunity to gain the powers of avoidance” provided by U.”
In Re Atlas Shipping A/S, 404 B.R. 726 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009). “11 U.S.C. § 1523 (a). The only court that appears to have addressed in a published opinion the scope of the avoidance action carve-out is the district court in Fogerty v.”
In Re Condor Ins. Ltd., 601 F.3d 319 (5th Cir. 2010). “[20] 11 U.S.C. § 1523 (a) ("Upon recognition of a foreign proceeding, the foreign representative has standing in a case concerning the debtor pending under another chapter of this title to initiate actions under sections 522, 544, 545, 547, 548, 550, 553, and 724(a)"); UNCITRAL,…”
O'Sullivan v. Loy, 432 B.R. 551 (E.D. Va. 2010). “11 U.S.C. § 1523 (a). See Bufford, supra, at 140 (noting that Section 1523 curtails the avoidance powers that are available in article 23 of the Model Law); Clark, supra.”
Fogerty v. Petroquest Resources, Inc. (In re Condor Ins.), 601 F.3d 319 (5th Cir. 2010). “11 U.S.C. § 1523 (a) (“Upon recognition of a foreign proceeding, the foreign representative has standing in a case concerning the debtor pending under another chapter of this title to initiate actions under sections 522, 544, 545, 547, 548, 550, 553, and 724(a)”); UNCITRAL,…”
Fogerty v. Condor Guar., Inc. (In Re Condor Ins.), 411 B.R. 314 (S.D. Miss. 2009). “11 U.S.C. § 1523 (a). The parties do not dispute that the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code listed in Sections 1521(a)(7) and 1523(a) are avoidance actions, which are, generally speaking, actions concerning the recovery of property in a bankruptcy proceeding.”
In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. (2d Cir. 2025). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1523 (a). Based on this section, the liquidators assert that the “major premise” of the district court— that a foreign representative has no domestic avoidance powers in a Chapter 15 case—is “flat wrong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.