12 U.S.C. § 1439a

Deposits in special fund; availability for all purposes of Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Home Loan Bank Administration

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

All moneys and funds heretofore deposited in the Treasury of the United States under the last sentence of section 1439 11 See References in Text note below. of this title (including unexpended balances of moneys appropriated therefrom for administrative expenses), and hereafter all moneys and funds which would, except for this provision, be so depositable thereunder, shall be deposited with the Treasurer of the United States in a special deposit account and shall be available, retroactively as well as prospectively, for expenditure for all purposes of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and the Federal Home Loan Bank Administration, subject to subsections (a) and (b) of section 712a of title 15.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2022 · leading case: Furash & Co. v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 518 (Fed. Cl. 2000).
Furash & Co. v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 518 (Fed. Cl. 2000). · cites it 5× “§ 1438a (1994) and 12 U.S.C. § 1439a (1994), two statutes whose texts we consider later.”
Alan F. Gersman v. Grp. Health Ass'n, Inc., 975 F.2d 886 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “They offer us by way of example the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1439a (all monies deposited pursuant to the statute shall be available “retroactively as well as prospectively”); Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.”
Khandelwal v. Compuadd Corp., 780 F. Supp. 1077 (E.D. Va. 1992). “In the case at bar, sound legal authority compels prospective application of the new Act and, therefore, denial of Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend. 1 . This has certainly been the case in other statutes.”
Mass v. Martin Marietta Corp., 805 F. Supp. 1530 (D. Colo. 1992). “See, e.g., The Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.”
Thompson v. Johnson & Johnson Mgmt. Info. Ctr., 783 F. Supp. 893 (D.N.J. 1992). “§ 945 (a)(1) and (c) (1986) (provision for processing of benefits claims “pending on, or denied on or before” the effective date of the statute, and awarding benefits “on a retroactive basis”); The Federal Home Loan Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1439a (1989 & Supp.1991) (all monies…”
Smith v. Petra Cablevision Corp., 793 F. Supp. 417 (E.D.N.Y 1992). “§ 945 (a)(1) and (c) (1986) (providing for processing claims “pending on, or denied on or before” the effective date of the statute, and awarding benefits retroactively); The Federal Home Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1439a (1989 & Supp.1991) (all monies deposited pursuant to the…”
Murray Braun v. United States, 31 F.4th 793 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “” 12 U.S.C. § 1439a. Similarly, the now-repealed Black Lung Benefits Reform Act required the Secretary of Labor to reevaluate previously denied claims and award qualifying claimants benefits “on a retroactive basis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.