12 U.S.C. § 1731
Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1938–1987 · leading case: CIT Corp. v. United States, 150 F.2d 85 (9th Cir. 1945).
CIT Corp. v. United States, 150 F.2d 85 (9th Cir. 1945). “, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 , of the National Housing Act, 52 Stat.”
Terry v. United States, 131 F.2d 40 (8th Cir. 1942). “Corporation, to which the application was addressed, or the lumber company, to which the note was made payable and delivered, was an agency of the government or was entitled to have credit insurance under the Act (see 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 (d), and there was no expression of…”
United States v. Uram, 148 F.2d 187 (2d Cir. 1945). “The two defendants, Henry Sohmer and Morris Uram, were charged in three counts of an indictment with: (a) violation of 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 (a) ; (b) violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Groopman, 147 F.2d 782 (2d Cir. 1945). “, as specifically prohibited by 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 (a), as amended. Appellant Groopman, through his alter ego, appellant L.”
United States v. Borow, 101 F. Supp. 211 (D.N.J. 1951). “He had been charged *214 in three counts of an indictment with (a) violation of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 (a); (b) presenting false claims in violation of 18 U.”
City of Sacramento v. Sec'y of Hous. & Urban Dev., 363 F. Supp. 736 (E.D. Cal. 1972). “…1749aaa (mortgage insurance for private medical facilities). 3 . Subchapter III, 12 U.S.C. § 1716 . 4 . Subchapter V, 12 U.S.C. § 1731 .”
United States v. Teretha Hermon, & United States of Am. v. Betty Collins Hart & Willie Hart, 817 F.2d 1300 (7th Cir. 1987). “2 The certification form used by HUD, they note, warns the applicant that false statements are punishable under section 1001 but gives no similar warning with respect to section 1010.”
Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. v. Third Nat. Bank, 153 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1946). “24 , 25, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 , contains numerous provisions making the commission of acts, which would be detrimental and injurious to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, criminal offenses.”
United States v. Minkow, 108 F. Supp. 509 (N.D. Ill. 1952). “On June 4, 1951, the Grand Jury for the-United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, returned an indictment, which charges that Irving Minkow and Sol Katz knowingly made false statements to banks for the purpose of obtaining loans with the intent that such loans…”
Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. v. Third Nat. Bank, 173 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1949). “C, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 (e), 'although this court had previously held in this case that the federal court has jurisdiction of civil sanctions under § 1731(e), 12 U.”
Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. v. Third Nat. Bank, 60 F. Supp. 110 (M.D. Tenn. 1945). “Paragraph numbered “2” of the amendment states that as one of the basis 6f its claim, plaintiff shows a violation by the defendant of Title 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 (e). in that defendant, for the purpose of influencing the action of .”
United States v. Thomas, 52 F. Supp. 571 (E.D. Wash. 1943). “§§ 83-88 ; Title 12 U.S.C.A. § 1731 . The five moving defendants are: C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.