12 U.S.C. § 1831d

State-chartered insured depository institutions and insured branches of foreign banks

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Interest rates

In order to prevent discrimination against State-chartered insured depository institutions, including insured savings banks, or insured branches of foreign banks with respect to interest rates, if the applicable rate prescribed in this subsection exceeds the rate such State bank or insured branch of a foreign bank would be permitted to charge in the absence of this subsection, such State bank or such insured branch of a foreign bank may, notwithstanding any State constitution or statute which is hereby preempted for the purposes of this section, take, receive, reserve, and charge on any loan or discount made, or upon any note, bill of exchange, or other evidence of debt, interest at a rate of not more than 1 per centum in excess of the discount rate on ninety-day commercial paper in effect at the Federal Reserve bank in the Federal Reserve district where such State bank or such insured branch of a foreign bank is located or at the rate allowed by the laws of the State, territory, or district where the bank is located, whichever may be greater.

(b) Interest overcharge; forfeiture; interest payment recovery

If the rate prescribed in subsection (a) exceeds the rate such State bank or such insured branch of a foreign bank would be permitted to charge in the absence of this section, and such State fixed rate is thereby preempted by the rate described in subsection (a), the taking, receiving, reserving, or charging a greater rate of interest than is allowed by subsection (a), when knowingly done, shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon. If such greater rate of interest has been paid, the person who paid it may recover in a civil action commenced in a court of appropriate jurisdiction not later than two years after the date of such payment, an amount equal to twice the amount of the interest paid from such State bank or such insured branch of a foreign bank taking, receiving, reserving, or charging such interest.

(Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, § 2[27], as added Pub. L. 96–221, title V, § 521, Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 164; amended Pub. L. 100–86, title I, § 101(g)(2), Aug. 10, 1987, 101 Stat. 563; Pub. L. 101–73, title II, § 201(a), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 187.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 1831a of this title prior to its repeal by Pub. L. 96–221.

Amendments

1989—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–73 substituted “insured depository institutions” for “insured banks”.

1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–86 struck out “and insured mutual savings banks” after “insured savings banks”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section applicable only with respect to loans made in any State during the period beginning on April 1, 1980, and ending on the date, on or after April 1, 1980, on which such State adopts a law or certifies that the voters of such State have voted in favor of any provision, constitutional or otherwise, which states explicitly and by its terms that such State does not want this section to apply with respect to loans made in such State, except that this section shall apply to a loan made on or after the date such law is adopted or such certification is made if such loan is made pursuant to a commitment to make such loan which was entered into on or after April 1, 1980, and prior to the date on which such law is adopted or such certification is made, see section 525 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1785 of this title.

Choice of Highest Applicable Interest Rate

In any case in which one or more provisions of, or amendments made by, title V of Pub. L. 96–221, section 1735f–7 of this title, or any other provisions of law, including section 85 of this title, apply with respect to the same loan, mortgage, credit sale, or advance, such loan, mortgage, credit sale, or advance may be made at the highest applicable rate, see section 528 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as a note under section 1735f–7a of this title.

Definition of “State”

For purposes of this section, the term “State” to include the several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands, see section 527 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as a note under section 1735f–7a of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 91 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009).
Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009). · cites it 2× “3 Although those counterclaims were framed under state law, Discover urged that they were governed entirely by federal law, specifically, § 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA), 12 U. S. C. § 1831d(a). Section 27(a) prescribes the interest rates state-chartered,…”
Thomas v. US Bank Nat'l Ass'n ND, 575 F.3d 794 (8th Cir. 2009). · cites it 6× “The lenders removed the case to federal court arguing the state law claims were completely preempted by the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (DIDA), 12 U.S.C. § 1831d. Agreeing with the lenders, the district court denied Thomas’s motion to remand to…”
Patricia Heaton v. Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., Movant-Appellant, 297 F.3d 416 (5th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3× “In this case, the FDIC has argued both that the district court’s interpretation of 12 U.S.C. § 1831d is wrong on the merits and that the district court lacked the power even to apply this provision by deciding whether a particular financial institution is a “State bank” under §…”
Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp., 334 S.W.3d 477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “3d at 31; see also 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a); Thomas, 575 F.3d at 799 .”
Greenwood Trust Co. v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 971 F.2d 818 (1st Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “may, notwithstanding any State constitution or statute which is hereby preempted for the purposes of this section, take, receive, reserve, and charge on any loan or discount made, or upon any note, bill of exchange, or other evidence of debt, interest at a rate of not more than…”
MorEquity, Inc. v. Naeem, 118 F. Supp. 2d 885 (N.D. Ill. 2000). · cites it 4× “Fremont argues that § 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (“DIDMCA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1831d, preempts state law and allows Fremont to export the usury laws of a depository institution’s home state.”
McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Seven Day Builders of Arkansas, Inc., 613 S.W.2d 837 (Ark. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 5× “On those findings the trial court entered judgment under 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a), (b) for $48,771.82, double the amount of interest found to have been paid to appellant under the agreement.”
Flowers v. EZPawn Oklahoma, Inc., 307 F. Supp. 2d 1191 (N.D. Okla. 2004). · cites it 3× “Defendants also argue there is federal question jurisdiction as plaintiffs state claims are completely preempted by Section 27 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (“DIDA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1831d, which provides the exclusive remedy for borrowers who…”
Piñon v. Bank of Am., NA, 741 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 4× “§§ 85–86, and the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (“DIDMCA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a). Specifically, the complaint alleged that the National Bank Act and DIDMCA cannot authorize fees that constitute unconstitutionally excessive punitive damages.”
Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd. v. World Bus. Lenders, LLC (In re Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd.), 603 B.R. 41 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2019). · cites it 4× “51 Section 1831d is titled, "State-chartered insured depository institutions and insured branches of foreign banks," and states: (a) Interest Rates In order to prevent discrimination against State-chartered insured depository institutions .”
Bankwest, Inc. v. Thurbert E. Baker, 411 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2005). · cites it 18× “This appeal presents the question of whether the State of Georgia may regulate a narrow segment of agency agreements between in-state payday stores and out-of-state banks or whether the Georgia Act in issue is preempted by § 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”),…”
Griner v. Synovus Bank, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (N.D. Ga. 2011). · cites it 13× “§§ 85 , 86 (“the NBA”) and Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, 12 U.S.C. § 1831d (“DIDA”). On September 27, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, and on September 29, they moved to remand the case to state court,…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a) — 47 cases
Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009). “3 Although those counterclaims were framed under state law, Discover urged that they were governed entirely by federal law, specifically, § 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA), 12 U. S. C. § 1831d(a). Section 27(a) prescribes the interest rates state-chartered,…”
Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp., 334 S.W.3d 477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011). “3d at 31; see also 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a); Thomas, 575 F.3d at 799 .”
Greenwood Trust Co. v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 971 F.2d 818 (1st Cir. 1992). “may, notwithstanding any State constitution or statute which is hereby preempted for the purposes of this section, take, receive, reserve, and charge on any loan or discount made, or upon any note, bill of exchange, or other evidence of debt, interest at a rate of not more than…”
McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Seven Day Builders of Arkansas, Inc., 613 S.W.2d 837 (Ark. Ct. App. 1981). “On those findings the trial court entered judgment under 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a), (b) for $48,771.82, double the amount of interest found to have been paid to appellant under the agreement.”
Piñon v. Bank of Am., NA, 741 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir. 2014). “§§ 85–86, and the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (“DIDMCA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a). Specifically, the complaint alleged that the National Bank Act and DIDMCA cannot authorize fees that constitute unconstitutionally excessive punitive damages.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(a)(2005) — 1 case
Discover Bank v. Vaden, 409 F. Supp. 2d 632 (D. Maryland 2006).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1831d(b) — 8 cases
Thomas v. US Bank Nat'l Ass'n ND, 575 F.3d 794 (8th Cir. 2009). “The lenders removed the case to federal court arguing the state law claims were completely preempted by the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (DIDA), 12 U.S.C. § 1831d. Agreeing with the lenders, the district court denied Thomas’s motion to remand to…”
Griner v. Synovus Bank, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (N.D. Ga. 2011). “§§ 85 , 86 (“the NBA”) and Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, 12 U.S.C. § 1831d (“DIDA”). On September 27, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, and on September 29, they moved to remand the case to state court,…”
Hill v. Chem. Bank, 799 F. Supp. 948 (D. Minnesota 1992).
Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd. v. World Bus. Lenders, LLC (In re Rent-Rite Superkegs W., Ltd.), 603 B.R. 41 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2019). “51 Section 1831d is titled, "State-chartered insured depository institutions and insured branches of foreign banks," and states: (a) Interest Rates In order to prevent discrimination against State-chartered insured depository institutions .”
Discover Bank v. Vaden, 489 F.3d 594 (4th Cir. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.