12 U.S.C. § 2201
Notice of action on application
1988—Pub. L. 100–233 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: “Every applicant for a loan from an institution of the System shall be entitled to prompt written notice of action on his application, and, if the loan applied for is reduced or denied, the reason for such action, and of the applicant’s right to review under section 2202 of this title.”
1985—Pub. L. 99–205, § 302, provided for a “written” notice and for the applicant’s right to review under section 2202 of this title.
Amendment by Pub. L. 99–205 effective thirty days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1983–1993 · leading case: Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990).
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990). “" *717 12 U.S.C. § 2201 (b). The Act also provides that: "[W]hen a system lender determines that a loan is or has become distressed, the lender must provide written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring.”
Yankton Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Jensen, 416 N.W.2d 860 (S.D. 1987). “They argue that even the cases that hold that the FCA does not grant a private right of action make an exception as to 12 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 and counsel states in his brief: "The trial court in the present case clearly determined that the PCA had violated 12 U.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2201 (b). (b) That not later than 45 days before a lender begins foreclosure proceedings, the lender shall notify the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring.”
Donald E. Redd & Mary A. Redd v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Louis, Fed. Land Bank Ass'n of Ne. Missouri & Doug Browne, Tr., 851 F.2d 219 (8th Cir. 1988). “Section 302 amended 12 U.S.C.A. § 2201 to require written notice of action on an application, including reasons for denial or reduction of the requested loan.”
Jon E. Saltzman & Paul E. Saltzman v. Farm Credit Servs. of Mid-Am., Aca, 950 F.2d 466 (7th Cir. 1991). “In addition, the Act provides for extensive enforcement powers by the Farm Credit Administration (e.”
Harper v. Fed. Land Bank of Spokane, 878 F.2d 1172 (9th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2201 (a). If a loan application or loan restructuring proposal is denied, the applicant/borrower is entitled to learn the reason for the denial and to receive notice of the applicant’s/borrower’s right to seek review of the adverse decision.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2201 (b). (b) That not later than 45 days before a lender begins foreclosure proceedings, the lender shall notify the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring.”
Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Hill, 879 P.2d 1158 (Mont. 1993). “Specifically, the Hills refer *263 the Court to 12 U.S.C. § 2201 (b), 2202(a), 2202a - 2202d of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (amended 1985, 1988).”
Hartman v. Farmers Prod. Credit Ass'n, 628 F. Supp. 218 (S.D. Ind. 1983). “See, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Moreover, 12 U.”
Fed. Land Bank of Wichita v. Read, 703 P.2d 777 (Kan. 1985). “4441 (1985) are patterned after 12 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. They provide: “§ 614.”
In Re Nelson, 123 B.R. 993 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1991). “§ 1981 , 12 U.S.C. § 2201 , et seq., 7 C.F.R. § 1951 , and 11 U.”
Fed. Land Bank of St. Louis v. Hopmann, 658 F. Supp. 92 (E.D. Ark. 1987). “The law is well settled that the regulations of the Farm Credit Act do not create any affirmative duties or prohibitions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.