12 U.S.C. § 2202a
Restructuring distressed loans
Subject to subparagraph (B), the term “loan” means a loan made to a farmer, rancher, or producer or harvester of aquatic products, for any agricultural or aquatic purpose and other credit needs of the borrower, including financing for basic processing and marketing directly related to the borrower’s operations and those of other eligible farmers, ranchers, and producers or harvesters of aquatic products.
Except as provided in clause (ii), the term “loan” does not include a loan made on or after
Except as provided in subclause (II), if a loan designated for sale under clause (i) is not sold into a secondary market during the 180-day period that begins on the date of the designation, the provisions of this section and sections 2202, 2202b, 2202d, and 2219a of this title that would otherwise apply to the loan in the absence of the exclusion described in clause (i) shall become effective with respect to the loan.
If a loan described in subclause (I) is sold into a secondary market after the end of the 180-day period described in subclause (I), subclause (I) shall not apply with respect to the loan beginning on the date of the sale.
The terms “restructure” and “restructuring” include rescheduling, reamortization, renewal, deferral of principal or interest, monetary concessions, and the taking of any other action to modify the terms of, or forbear on, a loan in any way that will make it probable that the operations of the borrower will become financially viable.
Not later than 45 days before any qualified lender begins foreclosure proceedings with respect to a loan outstanding to any borrower, the lender shall notify the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and that the lender will review any such suitable loan for restructuring, and shall include with such notice a copy of the policy and the materials described in paragraph (1).
No qualified lender may foreclose or continue any foreclosure proceeding with respect to any distressed loan before the lender has completed any pending consideration of the loan for restructuring under this section.
This section shall not prevent a qualified lender from proposing a restructuring plan for an individual borrower in the absence of an application for restructuring from the borrower.
If a qualified lender determines that the potential cost to such qualified lender of restructuring the loan in accordance with a proposed restructuring plan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the qualified lender shall restructure the loan in accordance with the plan.
If two or more restructuring alternatives are available to a qualified lender under this section with respect to a distressed loan, the lender shall restructure the loan in conformity with the alternative that results in the least cost to the lender.
Each bank board of directors shall develop a policy within 60 days after
Each bank board shall submit the policy of the district governing the treatment of distressed loans under this section to the Farm Credit Administration. Notwithstanding the duty imposed by the preceding sentence, the other duties imposed by this section shall take effect on
The Farm Credit Administration may issue a directive requiring compliance with any provision of this section to any qualified lender that fails to comply with such provision.
This section shall not be construed to prevent any qualified lender from enforcing any contractual provision that allows the lender to foreclose a loan, or from taking such other lawful action as the lender deems appropriate, if the lender has reasonable grounds to believe that the loan collateral will be destroyed, dissipated, consumed, concealed, or permanently removed from the State in which the collateral is located.
The time limitation prescribed in subsection (b)(2), and the requirements of subsection (c), shall not apply to a loan that became a distressed loan before
Each Farm Credit Bank, on request of any association, may assist the association in restructuring loans under this section.
2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334, § 5411(22)(A)(i), inserted “and section 2219a of this title” after “this part” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(5)(B)(ii)(I). Pub. L. 115–334, § 5411(22)(A)(ii), struck out “2202c,” after “2202b,”.
Subsecs. (h) to (j). Pub. L. 115–334, § 5411(22)(B), (C), redesignated subsecs. (i) to (k) as (h) to (j), respectively, and struck out former subsec. (h). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (h) read as follows: “During the 5-year period beginning on
“(1) the results of the review of distressed loans of the lender; and
“(2) the financial effect of loan restructurings and liquidations on the lender.”
Subsecs. (k), (l). Pub. L. 115–334, § 5411(22)(C), (D), redesignated subsec. (l) as (k) and struck out “production credit” after “request of any”. Former subsec. (k) redesignated (j).
1996—Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 104–105 designated existing provisions as subpar. (A), inserted subpar. heading, substituted “Subject to subparagraph (B), the term” for “The term”, and added subpar. (B).
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–399, § 102(a), struck out “(other than in sections 2205 and 2206 of this title)” after “in this part”.
Subsec. (a)(6)(B). Pub. L. 100–399, § 102(b), substituted “section 2015(b)(1)(B) of this title” for “section 2074(a)(2) of this title” and “section 2015(b)(1) of this title” for “section 2074(a) of this title”.
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 100–399, § 102(c), substituted “cost to such qualified” for “cost to a qualified”.
Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 100–399, § 102(d), substituted “bank” for “farm credit district”.
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 100–399, § 102(e), substituted “bank board” for “district board”.
Subsec. (l). Pub. L. 100–399, § 102(f), substituted “Farm Credit Bank” for “Federal intermediate credit bank”.
Amendment by section 102(b), (f) of Pub. L. 100–399 effective immediately after amendment made by section 401 of Pub. L. 100–233, which was effective 6 months after
Pub. L. 100–233, title I, § 102(b),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “The Court Did Not Err in Applying the Restructure Provision of the Farm Credit Act Defendants claim that the court erred by refusing to apply the restructure provision of the FCA, 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b), to bar Premier's request for appointment of a receiver, its request for…”
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 987 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1999). “THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN DECLINING TO APPLY EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO RELIEVE EIA-CA FROM COMPLYING WITH 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b). EIACA claims that because Ira Neibaur stated in a deposition that he did not intend to repay his loans and that he did not want EIACA to consider…”
State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist., 881 P.2d 594 (Mont. 1994). “Can an allegation that a Farm Credit Bank failed to comply with the restructure provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 found *6 at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1988) provide an affirmative defense to a foreclosure action by that bank? 3.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Stevenson, 869 P.2d 1365 (Idaho 1994). “On February 18, 1988, Stevenson applied to restructure his loan, as provided by the Federal Agricultural Credit Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1987) (“ACA”). Stevenson’s application was denied.”
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 944 P.2d 1386 (Idaho 1997). “12 U.S.C.A. § 2202a(a)(3) (1989). Credit Association submitted the Supplemental Affidavit of Gary L.”
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term "cost of foreclosure" includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bosch, 432 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 1988). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a) — 1 case
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(1) — 1 case
Puerto Rico Farm Credit, ACA v. Eco-Parque del Tanama Corp., 30 F.4th 72 (1st Cir. 2022).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(1)(2) — 1 case
Lillard v. Farm Credit Servs. of Mid-Am., 831 S.W.2d 626 (Ky. Ct. App. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) — 3 cases
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term "cost of foreclosure" includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
In Re Felten, 95 B.R. 629 (Bankr. D. Iowa 1988).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2)(A) — 3 cases
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
Harper v. Fed. Land Bank of Spokane, 692 F. Supp. 1244 (D. Or. 1988).
AgAmerica, FCB v. Robson, 901 P.2d 100 (Mont. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(3) — 9 cases
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 944 P.2d 1386 (Idaho 1997). “12 U.S.C.A. § 2202a(a)(3) (1989). Credit Association submitted the Supplemental Affidavit of Gary L.”
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term "cost of foreclosure" includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(4) — 3 cases
In Re Hilton Land & Cattle Co., 101 B.R. 604 (D. Neb. 1989).
Fed. Land Bank of St. Louis v. Cupples Bros., 889 F.2d 764 (8th Cir. 1989).
In Re Nelson, 123 B.R. 993 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(6) — 4 cases
Harper v. Fed. Land Bank of Spokane, 692 F. Supp. 1244 (D. Or. 1988).
Hill v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis, 726 F. Supp. 1201 (E.D. Mo. 1989).
In Re Nelson, 123 B.R. 993 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1991).
Linrud v. Anderson, 487 N.W.2d 613 (N.D. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(7) — 7 cases
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist., 881 P.2d 594 (Mont. 1994). “Can an allegation that a Farm Credit Bank failed to comply with the restructure provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 found *6 at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1988) provide an affirmative defense to a foreclosure action by that bank? 3.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term "cost of foreclosure" includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Lillard v. Farm Credit Servs. of Mid-Am., 831 S.W.2d 626 (Ky. Ct. App. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(l) — 1 case
Walker v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Louis, 726 F. Supp. 211 (C.D. Ill. 1989).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(l)(A) — 1 case
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b) — 4 cases
Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “The Court Did Not Err in Applying the Restructure Provision of the Farm Credit Act Defendants claim that the court erred by refusing to apply the restructure provision of the FCA, 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b), to bar Premier's request for appointment of a receiver, its request for…”
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 987 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1999). “THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN DECLINING TO APPLY EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO RELIEVE EIA-CA FROM COMPLYING WITH 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b). EIACA claims that because Ira Neibaur stated in a deposition that he did not intend to repay his loans and that he did not want EIACA to consider…”
Farm Credit Bank of Texas v. Sturgeon, 640 So. 2d 666 (La. Ct. App. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1) — 5 cases
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 944 P.2d 1386 (Idaho 1997). “12 U.S.C.A. § 2202a(a)(3) (1989). Credit Association submitted the Supplemental Affidavit of Gary L.”
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist., 881 P.2d 594 (Mont. 1994). “Can an allegation that a Farm Credit Bank failed to comply with the restructure provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 found *6 at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1988) provide an affirmative defense to a foreclosure action by that bank? 3.”
Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bosch, 432 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 1988). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Indus. Bankers v. Weiser (10th Cir. 2025).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(2) — 10 cases
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 987 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1999). “THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN DECLINING TO APPLY EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO RELIEVE EIA-CA FROM COMPLYING WITH 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b). EIACA claims that because Ira Neibaur stated in a deposition that he did not intend to repay his loans and that he did not want EIACA to consider…”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 944 P.2d 1386 (Idaho 1997). “12 U.S.C.A. § 2202a(a)(3) (1989). Credit Association submitted the Supplemental Affidavit of Gary L.”
Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Stevenson, 869 P.2d 1365 (Idaho 1994). “On February 18, 1988, Stevenson applied to restructure his loan, as provided by the Federal Agricultural Credit Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1987) (“ACA”). Stevenson’s application was denied.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(3) — 19 cases
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 987 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1999). “THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN DECLINING TO APPLY EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO RELIEVE EIA-CA FROM COMPLYING WITH 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b). EIACA claims that because Ira Neibaur stated in a deposition that he did not intend to repay his loans and that he did not want EIACA to consider…”
Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Stevenson, 869 P.2d 1365 (Idaho 1994). “On February 18, 1988, Stevenson applied to restructure his loan, as provided by the Federal Agricultural Credit Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1987) (“ACA”). Stevenson’s application was denied.”
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(l) — 14 cases
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 987 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1999). “THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN DECLINING TO APPLY EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO RELIEVE EIA-CA FROM COMPLYING WITH 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b). EIACA claims that because Ira Neibaur stated in a deposition that he did not intend to repay his loans and that he did not want EIACA to consider…”
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 944 P.2d 1386 (Idaho 1997). “12 U.S.C.A. § 2202a(a)(3) (1989). Credit Association submitted the Supplemental Affidavit of Gary L.”
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(c) — 4 cases
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist., 881 P.2d 594 (Mont. 1994). “Can an allegation that a Farm Credit Bank failed to comply with the restructure provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 found *6 at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1988) provide an affirmative defense to a foreclosure action by that bank? 3.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term "cost of foreclosure" includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(c)(l) — 1 case
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(d) — 1 case
AgAmerica, FCB v. Robson, 901 P.2d 100 (Mont. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(d)(1)(B) — 1 case
In Re Felten, 95 B.R. 629 (Bankr. D. Iowa 1988).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(d)(2) — 3 cases
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
Hill v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis, 726 F. Supp. 1201 (E.D. Mo. 1989).
Puerto Rico Farm Credit, ACA v. Eco-Parque del Tanama Corp., 30 F.4th 72 (1st Cir. 2022).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(d)(l) — 3 cases
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
AgAmerica, FCB v. Robson, 901 P.2d 100 (Mont. 1995).
Farm Credit Bank of Texas v. Sturgeon, 640 So. 2d 666 (La. Ct. App. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(d)(l)(A) — 2 cases
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
AgAmerica, FCB v. Robson, 901 P.2d 100 (Mont. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(e) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist., 881 P.2d 594 (Mont. 1994). “Can an allegation that a Farm Credit Bank failed to comply with the restructure provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 found *6 at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1988) provide an affirmative defense to a foreclosure action by that bank? 3.”
Fed. Land Bank of St. Louis v. Cupples Bros., 889 F.2d 764 (8th Cir. 1989).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(e)(1) — 6 cases
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
State Ex Rel. Farm Credit Bank v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist., 881 P.2d 594 (Mont. 1994). “Can an allegation that a Farm Credit Bank failed to comply with the restructure provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 found *6 at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a (1988) provide an affirmative defense to a foreclosure action by that bank? 3.”
Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Asbridge, 474 N.W.2d 490 (N.D. 1991).
Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bosch, 432 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 1988). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
In Re Felten, 95 B.R. 629 (Bankr. D. Iowa 1988).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(e)(2) — 2 cases
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
Puerto Rico Farm Credit, ACA v. Eco-Parque del Tanama Corp., 30 F.4th 72 (1st Cir. 2022).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(e)(l) — 8 cases
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 909 F.2d 1181 (8th Cir. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term “cost of foreclosure” includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
United States v. Case (In Re Case), 115 B.R. 666 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). “The debtor argued that the land should be valued between $200,000 and $250,000 and then reduced to net recovery value by deducting the costs of liquidation as provided in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (“Act”), codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)-(Z). Similarly, the debtor…”
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Huether, 454 N.W.2d 710 (N.D. 1990). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
Raymond P. Zajac & Helen Ann Zajac v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 887 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1989). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(a)(2) and (e) provide as follows: (a)(2) Cost of foreclosure The term "cost of foreclosure" includes— (A) the difference between the outstanding balance due on a loan made by a qualified lender and the liquidation value of the loan, taking into consideration…”
Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bosch, 432 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 1988). “12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b)(1). If the lender determines that the potential cost of restructuring the loan is less than or equal to the potential cost of foreclosure, the lender must restructure the loan.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(g) — 2 cases
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
Farm Credit Bank of Texas v. Sturgeon, 640 So. 2d 666 (La. Ct. App. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(g)(2) — 1 case
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(g)(l) — 2 cases
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul, 499 N.W.2d 43 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Respondent contends, and the trial court found, that FCB did not violate the Farm Credit Act.”
Griffin v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 708 F. Supp. 313 (D. Kan. 1989). “The loan restructuring process is primarily set forth at 12 U.S.C. § 2202a. Once a loan is or has become distressed, the lender is required to give written notice to the borrower that the loan may be suitable for restructuring and to provide a copy of lender’s policy governing…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(i) — 1 case
Compeer Fin., PCA v. Sunwold Farms, Inc. (D.S.D. 2025).
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(j) — 2 cases
Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC, 155 P.3d 504 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “The Court Did Not Err in Applying the Restructure Provision of the Farm Credit Act Defendants claim that the court erred by refusing to apply the restructure provision of the FCA, 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b), to bar Premier's request for appointment of a receiver, its request for…”
E. Idaho Agric. Credit Ass'n v. Neibaur, 987 P.2d 314 (Idaho 1999). “THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN DECLINING TO APPLY EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO RELIEVE EIA-CA FROM COMPLYING WITH 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(b). EIACA claims that because Ira Neibaur stated in a deposition that he did not intend to repay his loans and that he did not want EIACA to consider…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 2202a(k) — 1 case
Hill v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis, 726 F. Supp. 1201 (E.D. Mo. 1989).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.