12 U.S.C. § 226
ALTERNATIVE STATE STRATEGY.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Donmar Enter., Inc. v. S. Nat'l Bank, 828 F. Supp. 1230 (W.D.N.C. 1993).
Donmar Enter., Inc. v. S. Nat'l Bank, 828 F. Supp. 1230 (W.D.N.C. 1993). “12 U.S.C.A. § 226 (West 1989). 3 . Regulation J itself defines Fedwire as "the funds-transfer system owned and operated by the Federal Reserve Bank that is used primarily for the transmission and settlement of payment orders governed by this subpart.”
Alabama Cent. Credit Union v. United States, 646 F. Supp. 1199 (N.D. Ala. 1986). “Pursuant to the Monetary Control Act of 1980, 12 U.S.C. §§ 226 , et seq., ACCU was required to spin off its corporate business and establish a separate organization, Alabama Corporate Credit Union, to service its corporate credit union members.”
Matter of Indiana State Bar Ass'n, 550 N.E.2d 311 (Ind. 1990). “Within the past *314 decade, interest bearing checking accounts became authorized by the Consumer Checking Account Equity Act of 1980, 12 U.S.C. § 226 , amending 12 U.S.C. § 1832 .”
In re Indiana State Bar Ass'n's Petition to Authorize a Prog. Governing Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts, 550 N.E.2d 311 (Ind. 1990). “Within the past *314 decade, interest bearing checking accounts became authorized by the Consumer Checking Account Equity Act of 1980, 12 U.S.C. § 226 , amending 12 U.S.C. § 1882 .”
Flagship Nat'l Bank of Miami v. Com. Bank & Trust Co., 428 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). “1512 (1982) (to be codified at 12 U.S.C. § 226 note).”
Am. Bankers Ass'n v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). “3641 (1978) (codified at 12 U.S.C. § 226 note (2012) (Separability; Right to Amend, Alter or Repeal)).”
Smith v. Crowl (E.D. Cal. 2023). “12 U.S.C. § 226 . 12 Plaintiff does not specify any provision of the Federal Reserve Act that defendants allegedly 13 violated.”
Rorrer [Whitfield] v. JW Revocable Living Trust, Attorney-In-Fact for John Joseph Whitfield (D.S.C. 2023). “12 U.S.C. § 226 et seq. 12 U.S.C. § 411 titled “Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption,” governs the issuance of Federal Reserve notes and delegates to the Federal Reserve System the power to make clear that such notes are authorized currency of the United…”
Kinnaird v. Capital One (N.D. Ala. 2024). “MEMORANDUM OPINION Septemba Kinnaird sues Capital One, asserting claims pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. § 226 ; the Bill of Exchange Act; 12 U.”
Urrego v. Samuel White P.C. (E.D. Va. 2019). “, and Count III pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 12 U.S.C. § 226 , et seg., and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (“HOEPA”), 15 U.”
Hall v. NYC Water Bd. (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “2 Public Use and the Takings Clause,” the “Federal Trade Commission Act, (pursuant to) Section 5(a),” “12 USC § 411 and 12 USC § 226 ,” “Chapter 2(6) of the Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881, regarding the Bill of Ex[c]hange.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.