Notes of Decisions
Fourth Corner Credit Union v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 861 F.3d 1052 (10th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 10× “The Credit Union asserted that the Reserve Bank is required by statute to issue a master account to every applicant, citing 12 U.S.C. § 248a. The Reserve Bank moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that (1) the Reserve Bank retains statutory discretion to deny master-account…”
Washington Petroleum & Supply Co. v. Girard Bank, 629 F. Supp. 1224 (M.D. Penn. 1983).
“5 See 12 U.S.C. § 248a(b). It also supervises and examines certain depository institutions, bank holding companies, Edge Act and Agreement Corporations, and limited purpose trust companies, all of which must be situated within the Second Federal Reserve District.”
Fourth Corner Credit Union v. Fed. Reserve Bank, 154 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (D. Colo. 2016).
· cites it 2× “in New York did not create personal jurisdiction because they did no more than compensate for a statutorily mandated act under 12 U.S.C. § 248a). However, it is at least implicit that this statute does not mandate the opening of a master -account that will facilitate activities…”
Northpark Nat'l Bank v. Bankers Trust Co., 572 F. Supp. 520 (S.D.N.Y. 1983).
“See 12 U.S.C. § 248a. It is clear that such fees were intended as no more than a rationing mechanism to cover the costs of a statutorily mandated activity.”
Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v. The Fed. Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2023).
· cites it 4× “Recounting the process of check collection in the Federal Reserve System, the Court of Appeals emphasized that Congress’s amendments to 12 U.S.C. § 248a made the services enumerated in that section “available to all banks, regardless of whether or not they were member banks.”
Custodia Bank Inc v. Fed. Reserve Bd. of Governors (D. Wyo. 2022).
· cites it 4× “A master account also enables its holder to access various services promised by 12 U.S.C. § 248a beyond deposit and withdrawal services, including wire transfer services, automated clearinghouse services, settlement services, securities safekeeping, and Federal Reserve float…”
PayServices Bank v. Fed. Reserve Bank of San Francisco (D. Idaho 2024).
· cites it 2× “12 U.S.C. § 248a (emphasis in original). Most obviously problematic to PayServices’ claim is that § 248a(c)(2) appears in Subchapter II of Chapter 3 of Title 12 of the United States Code.”
TNB USA Inc. v. Fed. Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2020).
“Procedural Posture On August 31, 2018, TNB filed its one count complaint alleging the FRBNY’s violation of Section 11A of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. § 248a(c)(2). (Id. at ¶ 120–124).”
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(a) — 3 cases
Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v. The Fed. Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2023).
“Recounting the process of check collection in the Federal Reserve System, the Court of Appeals emphasized that Congress’s amendments to 12 U.S.C. § 248a made the services enumerated in that section “available to all banks, regardless of whether or not they were member banks.”
Custodia Bank Inc v. Fed. Reserve Bd. of Governors (D. Wyo. 2022).
“A master account also enables its holder to access various services promised by 12 U.S.C. § 248a beyond deposit and withdrawal services, including wire transfer services, automated clearinghouse services, settlement services, securities safekeeping, and Federal Reserve float…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(b) — 2 cases
Washington Petroleum & Supply Co. v. Girard Bank, 629 F. Supp. 1224 (M.D. Penn. 1983).
“5 See 12 U.S.C. § 248a(b). It also supervises and examines certain depository institutions, bank holding companies, Edge Act and Agreement Corporations, and limited purpose trust companies, all of which must be situated within the Second Federal Reserve District.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(b)(1) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(b)(8) — 1 case
Fourth Corner Credit Union v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 861 F.3d 1052 (10th Cir. 2017).
“The Credit Union asserted that the Reserve Bank is required by statute to issue a master account to every applicant, citing 12 U.S.C. § 248a. The Reserve Bank moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that (1) the Reserve Bank retains statutory discretion to deny master-account…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(c) — 2 cases
Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v. The Fed. Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2023).
“Recounting the process of check collection in the Federal Reserve System, the Court of Appeals emphasized that Congress’s amendments to 12 U.S.C. § 248a made the services enumerated in that section “available to all banks, regardless of whether or not they were member banks.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(c)(1) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(c)(2) — 7 cases
Fourth Corner Credit Union v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 861 F.3d 1052 (10th Cir. 2017).
“The Credit Union asserted that the Reserve Bank is required by statute to issue a master account to every applicant, citing 12 U.S.C. § 248a. The Reserve Bank moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that (1) the Reserve Bank retains statutory discretion to deny master-account…”
Fourth Corner Credit Union v. Fed. Reserve Bank, 154 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (D. Colo. 2016).
“in New York did not create personal jurisdiction because they did no more than compensate for a statutorily mandated act under 12 U.S.C. § 248a). However, it is at least implicit that this statute does not mandate the opening of a master -account that will facilitate activities…”
TNB USA Inc. v. Fed. Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 2020).
“Procedural Posture On August 31, 2018, TNB filed its one count complaint alleging the FRBNY’s violation of Section 11A of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. § 248a(c)(2). (Id. at ¶ 120–124).”
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(c)(3) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 248a(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.