12 U.S.C. § 3106a
Compliance with State and Federal laws
1994—Par. (1). Pub. L. 103–328, § 107(c)(1), added subpar. (A) and redesignated former subpars. (A) and (B) as (B) and (C), respectively.
Par. (2). Pub. L. 103–328, § 107(c)(2), added subpar. (A) and redesignated former subpars. (A) and (B) as (B) and (C), respectively.
Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). “§3015 (a)(4) (National Consumer Co- operative Bank; Eligibility of Cooperatives) 12 U. S. C. §§3106a(1)(B) and (2)(B) (Foreign Bank Participation in Domestic Markets) 12 U.”
Syed Hassan v. City of New York, 804 F.3d 277 (3rd Cir. 2015). “§ 1311 (a) (employment); 12 U.S.C. § 3106a(1)(B), (2)(B) (banking); 12 U.”
Am Trust v. Ubs Ag, 78 F. Supp. 3d 977 (N.D. Cal. 2015). “§ 3106a, UBS became a “domesticated federal and/or state bank” by virtue of being regulated by the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the state banking regulator. AM Trust also contends that the court has specific jurisdiction in California.”
United States v. Myung S. Koh, 199 F.3d 632 (2d Cir. 1999). “§ 3106 (a), and the federal antidiscrimi-nation laws, see 12 U.S.C. § 3106a. Therefore, although it differentiates between state and federal branches of foreign banks, see, e.”
R. W. Sawant & Co. v. Ben Kozloff, Inc., 507 F. Supp. 614 (N.D. Ill. 1981). “First, plaintiff contends that under section 9(b) of the International Banking Act of 1978, 12 U.S.C. § 3106a, foreign banks doing business in the United States, such as Standard, must be treated in the same way as domestic banks and, therefore, that Standard should not be…”
Greenbaum v. Handlesbanken, 26 F. Supp. 2d 649 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). “See 12 U.S.C. § 3106a(2)(A). Thus, this Court finds the general principle applicable that a branch bank is not a separate legal entity from its foreign parent, and in the same way that an unincorporated division of a corporation cannot be sued or indicted, see BCCI (Luxembourg),…”
— 12 U.S.C. § 3106a(1)(B) — 2 cases
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). “§3015 (a)(4) (National Consumer Co- operative Bank; Eligibility of Cooperatives) 12 U. S. C. §§3106a(1)(B) and (2)(B) (Foreign Bank Participation in Domestic Markets) 12 U.”
Syed Hassan v. City of New York, 804 F.3d 277 (3rd Cir. 2015). “§ 1311 (a) (employment); 12 U.S.C. § 3106a(1)(B), (2)(B) (banking); 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 3106a(2)(A) — 1 case
Greenbaum v. Handlesbanken, 26 F. Supp. 2d 649 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). “See 12 U.S.C. § 3106a(2)(A). Thus, this Court finds the general principle applicable that a branch bank is not a separate legal entity from its foreign parent, and in the same way that an unincorporated division of a corporation cannot be sued or indicted, see BCCI (Luxembourg),…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.