12 U.S.C. § 3342

Transactions requiring services of State certified appraiser

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

In determining whether an appraisal in connection with a federally related transaction shall be performed by a State certified appraiser, an agency or instrumentality under this chapter shall consider whether transactions, either individually or collectively, are of sufficient financial or public policy importance to the United States that an individual who performs an appraisal in connection with such transactions should be a State certified appraiser, except that—(1) a State certified appraiser shall be required for all federally related transactions having a value of $1,000,000 or more; and(2) 1-to-4 unit, single family residential appraisals may be performed by State licensed appraisers unless the size and complexity requires a State certified appraiser, where a complex 1-to-4 unit single family residential appraisal means an appraisal for which the property to be appraised, the form of ownership, the property characteristics, or the market conditions are atypical.(Pub. L. 101–73, title XI, § 1113, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 514; Pub. L. 111–203, title XIV, § 1473(e)(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2191.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2010—Par. (2). Pub. L. 111–203 inserted “, where a complex 1-to-4 unit single family residential appraisal means an appraisal for which the property to be appraised, the form of ownership, the property characteristics, or the market conditions are atypical” before the period.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the date on which final regulations implementing that amendment take effect, or on the date that is 18 months after the designated transfer date if such regulations have not been issued by that date, see section 1400(c) of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 1601 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Jones v. Rosenberg, 940 A.2d 1109 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jones v. Rosenberg, 940 A.2d 1109 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008). “) Defendant failed to provide that appraiser meets licensing requirements (1,000,000 State Certified) per 12 USC § 3342 (1) or (2) and § 3350(5)(A)(B) and (C) 24.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.