12 U.S.C. § 4114
Permissible prepayment or voluntary termination and modification of commitments
Modify the binding commitments made pursuant to section 4112(a)(2) of this title that are dependent on such rental assistance.
Permit the owner to prepay the mortgage and terminate the plan of action and any implementing use agreements or restrictions, but only if the owner agrees in writing to comply with provisions of section 4113 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1995–2013 · leading case: Fredericksburg Non-Profit Hous. Corp. v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 244 (Fed. Cl. 2013).
Fredericksburg Non-Profit Hous. Corp. v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 244 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “” 12 U.S.C. § 4114 (a)(1)(A). Similarly, 12 U.”
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 67 Fed. Cl. 434 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “12 U.S.C. § 4114 (a)(1)(A). Similarly, a property owner could prepay if the Secretary approved a plan of action to sell, but there were no bids from qualified purchasers or HUD failed to provide the necessary assistance.”
Cca Assocs. v. United States, 667 F.3d 1239 (Fed. Cir. 2011). “12 U.S.C. § 4114 (a)(1)-(2). Owners who exited the program were allowed to raise their rents to market rates unless their project was located in a "low vacancy area" (defined by HUD as a less than 3% vacancy rate), in which case owners could not raise rates on existing tenants…”
CCA Assocs. v. United States, 75 Fed. Cl. 170 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “12 U.S.C. § 4114 (a)(3). Similarly, if HUD had approved the sale of the property, but the owner could not find a bona fide purchaser, the owner also could prepay.”
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 196 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “seeking prepayment under 12 U.S.C. § 4114 and, consequently, plaintiffs’ case is fatally flawed because plaintiffs have never requested HUD approval for prepayment.”
City Line Jt. Venture v. United States, 71 Fed. Cl. 486 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “12 U.S.C. § 4114 (a)(2). On March 28, 1996, Congress enacted the Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996, Pub.”
Celentano v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 596 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “LIHPRHA provided that “[a]n owner of eligible low-income housing may prepay, and a mortgagee may accept prepayment of, a mortgage on such housing only in accordance with a plan of action approved by the Secretary under [LIHPRHA] or in accordance with [ 12 U.S.C. § 4114 ].” 12…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.