12 U.S.C. § 94
Venue of suits
Any action or proceeding against a national banking association for which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has been appointed receiver, or against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver of such association, shall be brought in the district or territorial court of the United States held within the district in which that association’s principal place of business is located, or, in the event any State, county, or municipal court has jurisdiction over such an action or proceeding, in such court in the county or city in which that association’s principal place of business is located.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 314
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1929–2023 · leading case: Wachovia Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Daniel G. Schmidt III Priag LLC Dgs Investments, Inc., 388 F.3d 414 (4th Cir. 2004).
Wachovia Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Daniel G. Schmidt III Priag LLC Dgs Investments, Inc., 388 F.3d 414 (4th Cir. 2004). “The prior version of 12 U.S.C. § 94 at issue in that case read as follows: Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the *420 United States held within the district in which such association may be…”
Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co., 426 U.S. 148 (1976). “§ 5198 (1878), 12 U. S. C. § 94 . That section provides that "[a]ctions and proceedings against any [national banking] association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be…”
Firstar Bank, N.A., a Nat'l Banking Ass'n v. Lawrence J. Faul & Faul Chevrolet, Inc., an Illinois Corp., 253 F.3d 982 (1st Cir. 2001). “2d 218 (1977) held that a bank was “located” wherever it had a branch for purposes of a prior version of the venue statute for national banks, 12 U.S.C. § 94 (amended 1982). This holding of Bougas *987 should be used to interpret “located” in 28 U.”
Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau, 371 U.S. 555 (1963). “§ 5198 (1878), 12 U. S. C. § 94 , which provides: "Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State,…”
Wachovia Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Schmidt, 546 U.S. 303 (2006). “35 (1977), this Court interpreted the term “located” in the former venue statute for national banks, see 12 U. S. C. § 94 (1976 ed.), as encompassing any county in which a bank maintains a branch office.”
Michigan Nat'l Bank v. Robertson, 372 U.S. 591 (1963). “[1] Petitioner claimed that it could not be sued in Nebraska because of 12 U. S. C. § 94 [2] and that 12 U. S. C.”
Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank v. Bougas, 434 U.S. 35 (1977). “§ 5198, 12 U. S. C. § 94 : "Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State, county, or municipal court…”
Marquette Nat'l Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Serv. Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978). “§ 5198, 12 U. S. C. § 94 , states: “Suits, actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district.”
In Re Falstaff Brewing Corp. Antitrust Litig., 434 F. Supp. 1225 (J.P.M.L. 1977). “The national banks were originally named as defendants in the California antitrust and securities actions but were dismissed under the venue provision of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 94 . The plaintiffs subsequently filed antitrust complaints virtually identical to the one…”
Murphy v. First Nat'l Bank of Chicago, 228 N.W.2d 372 (Iowa 1975). “In so specially appearing, the Omaha and Chicago banks relied exclusively on the provisions of 12 U.S.C.A. § 94 , which provides as follows: “Actions and proceedings against any association under this chapter may be had in any district or Territorial court of the United States…”
In Re Investors Funding Corp. of New York Sec. Litig., 437 F. Supp. 1199 (J.P.M.L. 1977). “These four national banks were originally among the fifteen banks named as defendants in Bloor, but each of the four have since been dismissed or have made motions for dismissal from that action under the venue provision of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 94 . The original…”
Thomasson v. AmSouth Bank, N.A., 59 B.R. 997 (N.D. Ala. 1986). “Compare 12 U.S.C. § 94 and 28 U.S.C. § 1409 . See Matter of Chuck Harrison Dodge, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.