15 U.S.C. § 1026
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–136, title VI, § 601, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 742
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1974–1975 · leading case: Duke City Lumber Co. v. Butz, 382 F. Supp. 362 (D.D.C. 1974).
Duke City Lumber Co. v. Butz, 382 F. Supp. 362 (D.D.C. 1974). “§ 1021 , and the Economic Stabilization Act Amendments of 1971, 15 U.S.C. § 1026 (a), respectively. To the contrary, the timber set-aside program appears quite consistent with these national policies in that it is part of the aid to small business which Congress has declared…”
Raitport v. Chase Manhattan Capital Corp., 388 F. Supp. 1095 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1026 (a)(1) and (3) (1973) (emphasis added).”
Lekovitch v. Borough of Rankin, 330 A.2d 559 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1975). “§1904 note, 15 U.S.C.A. §1026 , 5 U.S.C.A. §5305 . The original *53 authority for Part 205 is the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.