15 U.S.C. § 1061

Execution of acknowledgments and verifications

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Acknowledgments and verifications required under this chapter may be made before any person within the United States authorized by law to administer oaths, or, when made in a foreign country, before any diplomatic or consular officer of the United States or before any official authorized to administer oaths in the foreign country concerned whose authority is proved by a certificate of a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States, or apostille of an official designated by a foreign country which, by treaty or convention, accords like effect to apostilles of designated officials in the United States, and shall be valid if they comply with the laws of the state or country where made.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1951–2002 · leading case: Clay Reg'l Water v. City of Spirit Lake, Iowa, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (N.D. Iowa 2002).
Clay Reg'l Water v. City of Spirit Lake, Iowa, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (N.D. Iowa 2002). “Subject matter jurisdiction was premised on the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1061 et seq. Id. Sixteen days after Wells’ Dairy filed suit in federal court, the Richardson Estate filed an action in Texas state court against Wells’ Dairy based on a Texas state property statute.”
North Star Mfg. Co. v. Wells Lamont Corp., 193 F.2d 204 (C.C.P.A. 1951). “86, now 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1061 , 1062, provides: “ * * * Any person who believes he would be damaged by the registration of a mark may oppose the same by filing notice of opposition, stating the grounds therefor, in the Patent Office within thirty days after the publication of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.