Notes of Decisions
Paduano v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 169 Cal. App. 4th 1453 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009).
“( 15 U.S.C. § 1232 .) That provision also requires disclosure of additional information, including the final assembly point, the suggested retail price, and the suggested retail prices for accessories and optional equipment.”
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 44 F.3d 1050 (1st Cir. 1995).
“15 U.S.C. § 1232 requires that auto manufacturers affix a label, the so-called "Monroney sticker,” on each new automobile, disclosing information such as the suggested retail price, the price for each accessory or optional equipment, and transportation charges.”
Carriuolo v. Gen. Motors LLC, 72 F. Supp. 3d 1323 (S.D. Fla. 2014).
· cites it 2× “See 15 U.S.C. § 1232 ; 49 C.F.R. § 575.302 . Further, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant felt compelled to send Plaintiffs a letter with the correct information when it discovered the error.”
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 844 F. Supp. 819 (D. Me. 1994).
“Monroney stickers are required by 15 U.S.C. § 1232 . Section 1232 requires that manufacturers affix a label on each new automobile disclosing information including the suggested retail price, the price for each accessory or optional equipment, and any transportation charges.”
Thomassen Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Goldbaum, 413 A.2d 218 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1980).
“Goldbaum noticed that the price information, required by Federal law (see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1232 , 1233) to be attached to the window was missing; but he did not question the omission.”
Edmond L. Lindsey v. Ford Motor Co., 271 So. 3d 757 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “" 15 U.S.C. § 1232 . While a manufacturer can be fined for failure to comply with 15 U.”
Kemp Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc. v. Hartford Auto. Dealers' Ass'n, 380 F. Supp. 1382 (D. Conn. 1974).
“See 15 U.S.C. § 1232 (f)(1). There thus exists no genuine issue of fact as to the existence of a conspiracy to fix prices 8 and thereby to monopolize the sale of automobiles, and the defendant automobile dealers are accordingly entitled to summary judgment on that portion of the…”
Boise Dodge, Inc. v. United States, 406 F.2d 771 (9th Cir. 1969).
“Section 1233(c) makes it an offense, with exceptions not here relevant, for any person willfully to remove any label affixed to a new automobile pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1232 (1964), prior to the time that the automobile is delivered to the actual custody and possession of the…”
Boateng v. BMW of North Am., LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00209 (E.D.N.Y Sept. 20, 2022).
· cites it 4× “Plaintiff has also brought claims that assert: breaches of express and implied warranties; negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment; violations of New York’s General Business Law § 349; violations of 15 U.S.C. § 1232 ; and negligent infliction of emotional distress.”
15 U.S.C. § 1232(1)(1): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.