15 U.S.C. § 13b
Cooperative association; return of net earnings or surplus
Nothing in this Act shall prevent a cooperative association from returning to its members, producers, or consumers the whole, or any part of, the net earnings or surplus resulting from its trading operations, in proportion to their purchases or sales from, to, or through the association.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1940–1985 · leading case: Nw. Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pac. Stationery & Printing Co., 472 U.S. 284 (1985).
Nw. Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pac. Stationery & Printing Co., 472 U.S. 284 (1985). “The court noted that §4 of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U. S. C. §13b, specifically approves the price discrimination occasioned by such expulsion and concluded that §4 therefore provided a mandate for self-regulation.”
Nashville Milk Co. v. Carnation Co., 355 U.S. 373 (1958). “15 U. S. C. § 13b. The only other section of the Act is § 3, with which we are concerned here.”
Pac. Stationery & Printing Co., an Oregon Corp. v. Nw. Wholesale Stationers, Inc., an Oregon Coop. Corp., 715 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir. 1983). “Such practices by a cooperative association are exempt from price discrimination prohibitions under 15 U.S.C. § 13b and also under an Oregon statute, Or.”
Int'l Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947). “1526 , 15 U.S.C. § 13b. [10] That court is authorized, but not required, to call upon the Federal Trade Commission to assist in framing decrees in antitrust cases.”
Farmers Coop. Co. v. Birmingham, 86 F. Supp. 201 (N.D. Iowa 1949). “1528 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 13b, refers to cooperatives generally in excluding distributions of net earnings or surplus by such organizations from the other provisions of that Act which prohibited any rebates which had the effect of lessening competition or creating a monopoly.”
Quality Bakers of Am. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 114 F.2d 393 (1st Cir. 1940). “ockholder renders any service, in connection with the sale commodities, to any seller so paying such fees; that the Association is an organization designed and used to facilitate and further the objectives and operations of the Service Company and its stockholders; that the…”
Am. Motor Specialties Co., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 278 F.2d 225 (2d Cir. 1960). “, was organized under the Cooperative Corporations Law of the State of New York, it was entitled to the protection of Section 4 of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13b. Quality Bakers of America v.”
Mid-South Distributors & Cotton States, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 287 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1961). “” 15 U.S.C.A. § 13b. 6 . These contentions briefly are: 1.”
Midland Coop. Wholesale v. Ickes, 125 F.2d 618 (8th Cir. 1942). “1528 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 13b, refers to cooperative organizations generally 11 while the District of Columbia Cooperative Association Act, 54 Stat.”
Alhambra Motor Parts v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 309 F.2d 213 (9th Cir. 1962). “, there are neither findings, conclusions nor discussion by the Examiner or the Commission regarding the economic and legal significance of the facts: (1) that this group buying organization performed substantially the same economic function as other warehouse distributors who…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.