15 U.S.C. § 1521

Working capital fund; establishment; amount; uses; reimbursement

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

There is established a working capital fund of $100,000, without fiscal year limitation, for the payment of salaries and other expenses necessary to the maintenance and operation of (1) central duplicating, photographic, drafting, and photostating services and (2) such other services as the Secretary, with the approval of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, determines may be performed more advantageously as central services; said fund to be reimbursed from applicable funds of bureaus, offices, and agencies for which services are performed on the basis of rates which shall include estimated or actual charges for personal services, materials, equipment (including maintenance, repairs, and depreciation) and other expenses: Provided, That such central services shall, to the fullest extent practicable, be used to make unnecessary the maintenance of separate like services in the bureaus, offices, and agencies of the Department: Provided further, That a separate schedule of expenditures and reimbursements, and a statement of the current assets and liabilities of the working capital fund as of the close of the last completed fiscal year, shall be included in the annual Budget.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–2009 · leading case: Lavie v. Ran, 406 B.R. 277 (S.D. Tex. 2009).
Lavie v. Ran, 406 B.R. 277 (S.D. Tex. 2009). “2008) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 1521 ). Under the predecessor of Chapter 15, Section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code, the ability to provide relief to foreign petitioners was largely discretionary, based on subjective factors and comity.”
Funding an Agency's Functions From Its Working Capital Fund (OLC 1982). · cites it 10× “The authority for a working capital fund in 15 U.S.C. § 1521 constitutes an exception to the Com ptroller G eneral’s rule prohibiting an agency from switching responsibility for funding a particular service from one appropriation account to another.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.