15 U.S.C. § 1633
Exemption for State-regulated transactions
The Bureau shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this part any class of credit transactions within any State if it determines that under the law of that State that class of transactions is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed under this part, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2021 · leading case: Belini v. Washington Mut. Bank, FA, 412 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2005).
Belini v. Washington Mut. Bank, FA, 412 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2005). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1633 ; see also Bizier v. Globe Fin.”
Palmer v. Champion Mortg., 465 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2006). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1633 ; Belini v. Wash. Mut. Bank, 412 F.”
Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant Co., 522 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1975). “Also, 15 U.S.C. § 1633 provides that: The Board shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this part [ 15 U.”
David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co., 716 F.2d 104 (2d Cir. 1983). “15 U.S.C. § 1633 . Accordingly, the FRB in 1970 exempted from compliance with TILA and Regulation Z most classes of credit transactions in Connecticut, including open end credit accounts.”
McKenna v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 693 F.3d 207 (1st Cir. 2012). “15 U.S.C. § 1633 ; 12 C.F.R. § 226.29 (2011); 47 Fed.”
Rodrigues v. Members Mortg. Co., Inc., 323 F. Supp. 2d 202 (D. Mass. 2004). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1633 ; 12 C.F.R. § 226.29 . Section 1633 of TILA provides: The [Federal Reserve] Board shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this part any class of credit transactions within any State if it determines that under the law of that State that class of…”
Sheedy v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 801 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 2015). “Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1633 , the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has exempted some credit transactions in Massachusetts that are instead regulated under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 140D, § 10(a).”
Botelho v. Citicorp Mortg., Inc. (In Re Botelho), 195 B.R. 558 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996). “CCCDA has a separate section for civil liability, which provides that: This subsection shall not bar a consumer then in default on the obligation from asserting a violation of this chapter, or any rule or regulation issued thereunder, as an original action, or as a defense or…”
In Re Permanent Surface Mining Reg. Litig.. Appeal of Peabody Coal Co., 653 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “” Appellant insists that the evident meaning of this section is that the Secretary may set out “mechanical and procedural provisions” governing formal aspects of the submission and approval process.”
Philibotte v. Nisource Corp. Servs. Co., 793 F.3d 159 (1st Cir. 2015). “2005) (explaining that Massachusetts has been granted an exemption that displaces “federal [TILA] law in favor of state [TILA] law”); see also 15 U.S.C. § 1633 ; 12 C.F.R. § 226.29 (b)(2).”
Sovereign Bank v. Sturgis, 863 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D. Mass. 2012). “15 U.S.C. § 1633 ; 12 C.F.R. § 226.29 . In 1982, Massachusetts was granted such an exemption.”
Stephens v. Household Fin. Corp., 566 P.2d 1163 (Okla. 1977). “1977); 15 U.S.C. § 1633 and Regulation Z 12 CFR § 226 (1970).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.