15 U.S.C. § 1675
Exemption for State-regulated garnishments
The Secretary of Labor may by regulation exempt from the provisions of section 1673(a) and (b)(2) of this title garnishments issued under the laws of any State if he determines that the laws of that State provide restrictions on garnishment which are substantially similar to those provided in section 1673(a) and (b)(2) of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1971–2016 · leading case: Hodgson v. Cleveland Mun. Court, 326 F. Supp. 419 (N.D. Ohio 1971).
Hodgson v. Cleveland Mun. Court, 326 F. Supp. 419 (N.D. Ohio 1971). “In the memorandum reference was made to 15 U.S.C. § 1675 (1970) providing for State-regulated garnishment.”
Ferre v. City Nat. Bank of Miami, 548 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). “The court hereby reserves ruling to enter an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Florida Statute Section 56.29(11)." The appellants contend that this action was barred by the statute of limitations, or laches, that it was barred by the federal Consumer Credit…”
Hodgson v. Hamilton Mun. Court, 349 F. Supp. 1125 (S.D. Ohio 1972). “164 ( 15 U.S.C. § 1675 ). 3 . A report of the Banking and Currency Committee refers to the many hours of testimony, the hundreds of pages of discussion and data concerning the effects of garnishment upon commerce and upon personal bankruptcies.”
First Nat'l Bank of Jasper v. Robinson (In Re Robinson), 240 B.R. 70 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1999). “§ 1673 (a) and (b)(2)] garnishments issued under the laws of any State if he determines that the laws of that State provide restrictions on garnishment which are substantially similar to those provided in section 303(a) and (b)(2) [ 15 U.”
Voss Prods., Inc. v. Carlton, 147 F. Supp. 2d 892 (E.D. Tenn. 2001). “§ 1673 provides: Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section 305 [ 15 U.S.C. § 1675 ], the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any work week which is subject to garnishment may not exceed (1) 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for…”
Hooter v. Wilson, 273 So. 2d 516 (La. 1973). “15 U.S.C.A. § 1675 . States were permitted under this sub-chapter to prohibit garnishments or provide for more limited garnishments.”
Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. Killop, 589 F. Supp. 390 (E.D. Mich. 1984). “Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section 305 [15 USCS § 1675], the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subject to garnishment may not exceed (1) 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or (2) the…”
Lucas Cty. Job & Fam. Servs. v. Joshaway, 2016 Ohio 5071 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “Except as provided in subsection (b) and in section 305 [15 USCS § 1675], the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subject to garnishment may not exceed (1) 25 per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or (2) the…”
Omega Accounts Servicing Corp. v. Koller, 503 F. Supp. 149 (D. Maryland 1980). “Title 15 U.S.C. § 1675 provides as follows: The Secretary of Labor may by regulation exempt from the provisions of section 303(a) and (b)(2) [ 15 U.”
Lutes v. Lutes, 722 S.W.2d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986). “The exception designated under Title 15 U.S.C. § 1675 does not apply herein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.