15 U.S.C. § 1679i

Statute of limitations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any action to enforce any liability under this subchapter may be brought before the later of—(1) the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date of the occurrence of the violation involved; or(2) in any case in which any credit repair organization has materially and willfully misrepresented any information which—(A) the credit repair organization is required, by any provision of this subchapter, to disclose to any consumer; and(B) is material to the establishment of the credit repair organization’s liability to the consumer under this subchapter,the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date of the discovery by the consumer of the misrepresentation.(Pub. L. 90–321, title IV, § 411, as added Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, § 2451, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–461.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section applicable after the end of the 6-month period beginning on Sept. 30, 1996, except with respect to contracts entered into by a credit repair organization before the end of such period, see section 413 of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 104–208, set out as a note under section 1679 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Rotkiske v. Klemm, 140 S. Ct. 355 (2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rotkiske v. Klemm, 140 S. Ct. 355 (2019). “§ 3416 ; 15 U.S.C. § 1679i. In fact, at the time Congress enacted the FDCPA, many statutes included provisions that, in certain circumstances, would begin the running of a limitations period upon the discovery of a violation, injury, or some other event.”

Newton v. Am. Debt Servs., Inc., 854 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Cal. 2012). “Code § 17208; 15 U.S.C. § 1679i (2006). *733 Second, the arbitration clause would prevent a customer from recovering attorney’s fees.”

Rotkiske v. Klemm, 589 U.S. 8 (2019). “§3416 ; 15 U. S. C. §1679i. In fact, at the time Congress enacted the FDCPA, many statutes included provisions that, in cer- tain circumstances, would begin the running of a limita- tions period upon the discovery of a violation, injury, or some other event.”

Ham v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (W.D. Wash. 2024). “§ 26 3416; 15 U.S.C. § 1679i; 15 U.S.C. § 77m; 19 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.