15 U.S.C. § 1692o
Exemption for State regulation
The Bureau shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this subchapter any class of debt collection practices within any State if the Bureau determines that under the law of that State that class of debt collection practices is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed by this subchapter, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1982–2017 · leading case: Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011).
Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011). “The Committee recognized that "States with substantially similar laws may be exempted from the act's requirements ( but not its remedies ) by applying to the Federal Trade Commission.”
Pamela Gillie v. Law Off. of Eric A. Jones, 785 F.3d 1091 (6th Cir. 2015). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1692o. If special counsel were similarly situated to officers or employees of the State of Ohio, the Ohio Attorney General could have sought an exemption under this provision of the statute.”
Vien-Phuong Thi Ho v. ReconTrust Co., 858 F.3d 568 (9th Cir. 2016). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1692o. I now proceed to address each of the provisions of the FDCPA that allegedly interfere with California’s arrangements for conducting nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings.”
Vien-Phuong Thi Ho v. Recontrust Co., 840 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 2016). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1692o. I now proceed to address each of the provisions of the FDCPA that allegedly interfere with California’s arrangements for conducting nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings.”
Jennifer Lynn Romea v. Heiberger & Assocs., 163 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1998). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1692o (1994). The record contains no indication that New York has made any such claim as to the sufficiency of the § 711 process to achieve the objectives of the FDCPA.”
Lipscomb v. Raddatz Law Firm, P.L.L.C., 109 F. Supp. 3d 251 (D.D.C. 2015). “Ill— 203, § 1089(1) (2010),] shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this sub-chapter any class of debt collection practices within any State if the Bureau determines that under the law of that State that class of debt collection practices is subject to requirements…”
Heredia, Hortantsa, & Schultze, Gloria, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Green, Edward A., 667 F.2d 392 (3rd Cir. 1982). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1692o. Under the statutory scheme any local exemption must first be passed upon by the Federal Trade Commission.”
Mendus v. Morgan & Assocs., P.C., 1999 OK CIV APP 137 (Okla. Civ. App. 1999). “15 U.S.C. § 1692o; 16 C.F.R. Part 901. 6 .”
Vien-Phuong Ho v. Recontrust Co. (9th Cir. 2017). “See 15 U.S.C. § 1692o. I now proceed to address each of the provisions of the FDCPA that allegedly interfere with California’s arrangements for conducting nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings.”
Shapiro v. Haenn, 176 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D. Me. 2002). “Id at § 817 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1692o). The FTC has promulgated reg *45 ulations explaining the process for obtaining an exemption under Section 817.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.