15 U.S.C. § 171

Repealed. Pub. L. 90–620, § 3, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1308

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2017 · leading case: Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency v. Nomura Holding Am., Inc., 873 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2017).
Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency v. Nomura Holding Am., Inc., 873 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2017). “See 15 U.S.C. § 171 (a)(2) (authorizing relief if the offering documents contain just one untrue statement of material fact); N.”
Dahl v. Gardner, 583 F. Supp. 1262 (D. Utah 1984). “1980), the Tenth Circuit held that a three-year limitations period in the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 171 (1), which was patterned after and contains language nearly identical to section 13, was absolute and could not be tolled with evidence of…”
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Davis, 33 F. Supp. 2d 640 (S.D. Ohio 1998). “Federal question jurisdiction is properly invoked under both the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 171 , et seq. and the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act, 49 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.