15 U.S.C. § 1804

Reinstatement of joint operating arrangements previously adjudged unlawful under antitrust laws

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Notwithstanding any final judgment rendered in any action brought by the United States under which a joint operating arrangement has been held to be unlawful under any antitrust law, any party to such final judgment may reinstitute said joint newspaper operating arrangement to the extent permissible under section 1803(a) of this title.(b) The provisions of section 1803 of this title shall apply to the determination of any civil or criminal action pending in any district court of the United State 11 So in original. Probably should be “States”. on July 24, 1970, in which it is alleged that any such joint operating agreement is unlawful under any antitrust law.(Pub. L. 91–353, § 5, July 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 467.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Hawaii Newspaper Agency v. Bronster, 103 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hawaii Newspaper Agency v. Bronster, 103 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 1996). “15 U.S.C. § 1804 (a). Hawaii has made several unsuccessful attempts to regulate or dismantle the Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin’s JOA.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.