15 U.S.C. § 260
Congressional declaration of policy; adoption and observance of uniform standard of time; authority of Secretary of Transportation
It is the policy of the United States to promote the adoption and observance of uniform time within the standard time zones prescribed by sections 261 to 264 of this title, as modified by section 265 of this title. To this end the Secretary of Transportation is authorized and directed to foster and promote widespread and uniform adoption and observance of the same standard of time within and throughout each such standard time zone.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2021 · leading case: Favel v. Am. Renovation & Constr. Co., 2002 MT 266 (Mont. 2002).
Favel v. Am. Renovation & Constr. Co., 2002 MT 266 (Mont. 2002). “§ 1144 (a) (2001) ("Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the provisions of this subchapter and subchapter III of this chapter shall supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan described in section…”
Holt v. State, 182 A.3d 322 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2018). “See 15 U.S.C. §§ 260 -263. On March 30, 2016, 21:55:24 UTC was 5:55:24 p.”
Reidelbach v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 2002 MT 289 (Mont. 2002). “§ 453 (2001); Uniform Time Act of 1966, 15 U.S.C. § 260 (b) (2001); Armored Car Industry Reciprocity Act, 15 U.”
Warren & Washington Indus. Dev. Agency v. Vill. of Hudson Falls Bd. of Health, 168 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). “1 [e]) regarding spills of polychlorinated biphenyls (hereinafter PCBs; see, 40 CFR part 761) enacted pursuant to 15 USC § 260 , the Toxic Substances Control Act, in determining the existence of the nuisance.”
State Ex Rel. Schirado v. Frye, 157 N.W.2d 830 (N.D. 1968). “107 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 260 et seq., Supp. 1967) provides for central standard time throughout the State of North Dakota, with the exception of the extreme southwestern corner.”
Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Ashton, 448 P.2d 185 (Idaho 1968). “See 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 260 , 260a, 263. Instead of the term “Mountain Standard Time” the decree should be modified to read “prevailing Mountain Time,” so that when daylight saving time is in effect the decree will be applicable to that time.”
Allied Theatre Owners of Indiana, Inc. v. Volpe, 426 F.2d 1002 (7th Cir. 1970). “We agree! The District Court also pointed out that the mandatory observance of Eastern daylight time is due to Section 3(a) of the Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 260 (a)) and to the veto of the Indiana Governor of the Act passed by the Indiana legislature which would have exempted the state…”
Empire Fire & Marine Ins. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 426 F. Supp. 2d 329 (D. Maryland 2006). “” 15 U.S.C.A. § 260 . The primary intention of Congress was to fix a uniform time for an advance to, and withdrawal from, daylight saving time.”
Corp. of Presiding Bishop, Etc. v. Ashton, 448 P.2d 185 (Idaho 1968). “See 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 260 , 260a, 263. Instead of the term "Mountain Standard Time" the decree should be modified to read "prevailing Mountain Time," so that when daylight saving time is in effect the decree will be applicable to that time.”
Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex. 2021). “DSC relies on the Uniform Time Act (“UTA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 260–267, which is the enabling statute for time zones.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.