15 U.S.C. § 2619

Citizens’ civil actions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In generalExcept as provided in subsection (b), any person may commence a civil action—(1) against any person (including (A) the United States, and (B) any other governmental instrumentality or agency to the extent permitted by the eleventh amendment to the Constitution) who is alleged to be in violation of this chapter or any rule promulgated under section 2603, 2604, or 2605 of this title, or subchapter II or IV, or order issued under section 2603 or 2604 of this title or subchapter II or IV to restrain such violation, or(2) against the Administrator to compel the Administrator to perform any act or duty under this chapter which is not discretionary.Any civil action under paragraph (1) shall be brought in the United States district court for the district in which the alleged violation occurred or in which the defendant resides or in which the defendant’s principal place of business is located. Any action brought under paragraph (2) shall be brought in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, or the United States district court for the judicial district in which the plaintiff is domiciled. The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over suits brought under this section, without regard to the amount in controversy or the citizenship of the parties. In any civil action under this subsection process may be served on a defendant in any judicial district in which the defendant resides or may be found and subpoenas for witnesses may be served in any judicial district.(b) LimitationNo civil action may be commenced—(1) under subsection (a)(1) to restrain a violation of this chapter or rule or order under this chapter—(A) before the expiration of 60 days after the plaintiff has given notice of such violation (i) to the Administrator, and (ii) to the person who is alleged to have committed such violation, or(B) if the Administrator has commenced and is diligently prosecuting a proceeding for the issuance of an order under section 2615(a)(2) of this title to require compliance with this chapter or with such rule or order or if the Attorney General has commenced and is diligently prosecuting a civil action in a court of the United States to require compliance with this chapter or with such rule or order, but if such proceeding or civil action is commenced after the giving of notice, any person giving such notice may intervene as a matter of right in such proceeding or action;(2) under subsection (a)(2) before the expiration of 60 days after the plaintiff has given notice to the Administrator of the alleged failure of the Administrator to perform an act or duty which is the basis for such action or, in the case of an action under such subsection for the failure of the Administrator to file an action under section 2606 of this title, before the expiration of ten days after such notification, except that no prior notification shall be required in the case of a civil action brought to compel a decision by the Administrator pursuant to section 2617(f)(3)(B) of this title; or(3) in the case of a civil action brought to compel a decision by the Administrator pursuant to section 2617(f)(3)(B) of this title, after the date that is 60 days after the deadline specified in section 2617(f)(3)(B) of this title.Notice under this subsection shall be given in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe by rule.(c) General(1) In any action under this section, the Administrator, if not a party, may intervene as a matter of right.(2) The court, in issuing any final order in any action brought pursuant to subsection (a), may award costs of suit and reasonable fees for attorneys and expert witnesses if the court determines that such an award is appropriate. Any court, in issuing its decision in an action brought to review such an order, may award costs of suit and reasonable fees for attorneys if the court determines that such an award is appropriate.(3) Nothing in this section shall restrict any right which any person (or class of persons) may have under any statute or common law to seek enforcement of this chapter or any rule or order under this chapter or to seek any other relief.(d) ConsolidationWhen two or more civil actions brought under subsection (a) involving the same defendant and the same issues or violations are pending in two or more judicial districts, such pending actions, upon application of such defendants to such actions which is made to a court in which any such action is brought, may, if such court in its discretion so decides, be consolidated for trial by order (issued after giving all parties reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard) of such court and tried in—(1) any district which is selected by such defendant and in which one of such actions is pending,(2) a district which is agreed upon by stipulation between all the parties to such actions and in which one of such actions is pending, or(3) a district which is selected by the court and in which one of such actions is pending.The court issuing such an order shall give prompt notification of the order to the other courts in which the civil actions consolidated under the order are pending.(Pub. L. 94–469, title I, § 20, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2041; renumbered title I and amended Pub. L. 99–519, § 3(b)(3), (c)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2989; Pub. L. 102–550, title X, § 1021(b)(9), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3923; Pub. L. 114–182, title I, §§ 15, 19(n), June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 498, 509.)Editorial NotesAmendments

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 114–182, § 19(n), substituted “order issued under section 2603 or 2604 of this title” for “order issued under section 2604 of this title”.

Subsec. (b)(2), (3). Pub. L. 114–182, § 15, substituted “, except that no prior notification shall be required in the case of a civil action brought to compel a decision by the Administrator pursuant to section 2617(f)(3)(B) of this title; or” for period at end of par. (2) and added par. (3).

1992—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 102–550 substituted “subchapter II or IV” for “subchapter II” in two places.

1986—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–519 inserted references to subchapter II of this chapter.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1977, see section 31 of Pub. L. 94–469, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 81 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: Am. Unites for Kids v. Sylvia Rousseau, 985 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2021).
Am. Unites for Kids v. Sylvia Rousseau, 985 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2021). · cites it 7× “Although the TSCA allows a court to award reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and other costs of suit under 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (c)(2), the district court denied fees and costs to the prevailing Plaintiff as part of the court’s sanctions order.”
Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Found., Inc., 484 U.S. 49 (1987). · cites it 2× “III); Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U. S. C. § 2619 (1982 ed. and Supp. IV).”
William Liebhart v. SPX Corp., 917 F.3d 952 (7th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “15 U.S.C. § 2619 (a)(1). The EPA promulgated the PCB regulations in question pursuant to statutory authority under TSCA, designating PCBs as "hazardous waste" and controlling their manufacture, use, storage, and disposal.”
Hallstrom v. Tillamook Cnty., 493 U.S. 20 (1990). · cites it 2× “); § 20(b) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U. S. C. § 2619 (b); § 11(g)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.”
City of Milwaukee v. Illinois, 451 U.S. 304 (1981). · cites it 2× “III); and § 20 (c) (3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U. S. C. § 2619 (c) (3). [22] The dissent's criticism of our reading of § 505 (e), post, at 341-342, is misplaced.”
Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of Albany, 250 F. Supp. 2d 48 (N.D.N.Y. 2003). · cites it 4× “INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Association (“plaintiff’), *52 pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (a)(1)(B), brought suit against defendants, alleging various violations of federal regulations governing…”
Upstate Forever v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., 887 F.3d 637 (4th Cir. 2018). “, 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (a)(1) (authorizing citizen suits against persons "alleged to be in violation of" the statute); 42 U.”
Brewer v. Ravan, 680 F. Supp. 1176 (M.D. Tenn. 1988). · cites it 3× “Civil Penalties Under TSCA’s citizen suit provision, 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (a)(1), a private party may commence a civil action “against any person .”
Rolando Serna v. Law Off. of Joseph Onwuteaka, e, 732 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “, 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (“Any civil action . . .”
Benzman v. Whitman, 523 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2008). “Conclusion We understand the Plaintiffs’ concern, supported in substantial part by the report of the EPA’s own Inspector General, that the agency’s performance in discharging its responsibilities in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, which involved an attack on America’s largest…”
Bowling v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 551 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 2× “See 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (a)(1) (stating that under this section, any person may commence a civil action against any other person, the United States or a governmental agency alleged to be in violation of the TSCA or any rules promulgated under the TSCA to restrain such violation).”
Ayres v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 551 (Fed. Cl. 2005). · cites it 4× “See 15 U.S.C. § 2619 . Instead, the specified private right of action authorizes suit against the United States only for injunctive relief, 6 and therefore vests exclusive jurisdiction in the United States District Courts, not the United States Court of Federal Claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.