15 U.S.C. § 3413
Repealed. Pub. L. 101–60, § 3(b)(5), July 26, 1989, 103 Stat. 159
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1980–1997 · leading case: Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Arco Oil & Gas Co., Intervenor, 816 F.2d 777 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Arco Oil & Gas Co., Intervenor, 816 F.2d 777 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “15 U.S.C. § 3413 . 19 . NGPA § 503(a)(1)(D), 15 U.”
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil & Gas Bd., 474 U.S. 409 (1986). “See §§ 503(c) and 602(a), 15 U. S. C. §§ 3413 (c) and 3432(a). Second, although FERC may now possess less regulatory jurisdiction over the "intricate relationship between the purchasers' cost structures and eventual costs to wholesale customers who sell to consumers in other…”
Pub. Serv. Comm'n of NY v. Mid-Louisiana Gas Co., 463 U.S. 319 (1983). “V), which provides that a first sale price may exceed the maximum lawful price if the excess is necessary to recover "State severance taxes attributable to the production of such natural gas and borne by the seller, but only to the extent the amount of such taxes does not exceed…”
WRT Energy Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 107 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 1997). “15 U.S.C. § 3413 (b)(1)(A). The FERC’s determination is renewable in a United States Court of Appeals.”
Pennzoil Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 645 F.2d 360 (5th Cir. 1981). “Under NGPA § 503, 15 U.S.C.A. § 3413 , state and federal agencies with regulatory jurisdiction over gas production determine whether gas qualifies for §§ 102, 103, 107, and 108.”
Enserch Expl., Inc., as Managing Gen. Partner of Ep Operating Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 887 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1989). “” 15 U.S.C. § 3413 (b)(1). Absent such a finding, the Commission may remand to the local regulatory authority if (A) the Commission finds that a State or Federal agency determination is not consistent with information contained in the public records of the Commission, and which…”
L & B Oil Co., Inc. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 665 F.2d 758 (5th Cir. 1982). “NGPA’s section 503(b), 15 U.S.C. § 3413 (b), requires only “notice” to the state agency and parties within 45 days.”
Union Texas Prods. Corp. & Union Texas Petroleum Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 899 F.2d 432 (5th Cir. 1990). “” If a producer met the various qualification requirements and followed the procedures prescribed under § 503 of the NGPA, 15 U.S.C. § 3413 , the § 108 price was deemed “just and reasonable.”
Ecee, Inc. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 645 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1981). “NGPA § 503, 15 U.S.C.A. § 3413 , concerns the determination of which NGPA incentive price category, if any, applies to a particular well, or to certain gas produced from a well.”
Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Martin Expl. Mgmt. Co., 486 U.S. 204 (1988). “The producer respondents also argue that FERC’s rule intrudes on the jurisdiction other state and federal agencies have to make category determinations under §503, 15 U. S. C. §3413 . FERC, however, has made no category determinations.”
In Re Texaco Inc., 84 B.R. 911 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). “1981) (where on review of Orders of FERC, the *924 court held that requirement that agency’s actions be ripe for judicial review before merits of any review petition will be addressed is one which applies to action of other agencies as well as that of the Federal Energy…”
Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 833 F.2d 341 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “The producers in this case contend that this court has no jurisdiction to review FERC’s determination that the partnerships’ natural gas qualified for incentive pricing, because under NGPA § 503, 15 U.S.C. § 3413 , judicial review is not available if FERC upholds — as it did in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.