15 U.S.C. § 3906

Injunctive orders issued by United States district courts

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any district court of the United States may issue an order enjoining a risk retention group from soliciting or selling insurance, or operating, in any State (or in all States) or in any territory or possession of the United States upon a finding of such court that such group is in hazardous financial condition. Such order shall be binding on such group, its officers, agents, and employees, and on any other person acting in active concert with any such officer, agent, or employee, if such other person has actual notice of such order.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Nat'l Home Ins. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 838 F. Supp. 1104 (E.D. Va. 1993).
Nat'l Home Ins. v. State Corp. Comm'n, 838 F. Supp. 1104 (E.D. Va. 1993). “§ 3902 (f)(1)-(2) (1993); 15 U.S.C. § 3906 (1992); National Amusement, 905 F.”
Nat'l Warranty Ins. v. Greenfield, 24 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (D. Or. 1998). “Nothing in the LRRA suggests that Congress expressly intended to foreclose the § 1983 remedy. Nor has Congress impliedly foreclosed this remedy by providing a comprehensive remedial scheme within the LRRA itself.”
Dillon v. Combs, 895 F.2d 1175 (7th Cir. 1990). “Another part of the Risk Retention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 3906 , added in 1986, does create a federal right of action.”
Scales v. Mem'l Med. Ctr. of Jacksonville, Inc., 690 F. Supp. 1002 (M.D. Fla. 1988). “15 U.S.C. § 3906 (Supp. IV 1986). No similar expression of jurisdiction is provided on behalf of risk retention groups.”
Classic Motel, Inc. v. Coral Grp., Ltd., 833 F. Supp. 593 (S.D. Miss. 1993). “Another part of the Risk Retention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 3906 , added in 1986, does create a federal right of action.”
Nat'l Warranty Ins. v. Greenfield, 214 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2000). “15 U.S.C. § 3906 . A construction that reads § 3905(d) as referring to particular RRGs rather than to all RRGs does not render these provi *1079 sions superfluous.”
Inter Ins. Agency Servs. Ltd. v. Ins. Dep't of the State of Oklahoma (E.D.N.Y 2024). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. §3906 . Oklahoma’s own statute regarding the regulation of risk retention groups, Okla.”
Inter Ins. Agency Servs. Ltd. v. Ins. Dep't of the State of Oklahoma (W.D. Okla. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. §3906 . Oklahoma’s own statute regarding the regulation of risk retention groups, Okla.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.