15 U.S.C. § 42

Employees; expenses

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Each commissioner shall receive a salary, payable in the same manner as the salaries of the judges of the courts of the United States. The commission shall appoint a secretary, who shall receive a salary, and it shall have authority to employ and fix the compensation of such attorneys, special experts, examiners, clerks, and other employees as it may from time to time find necessary for the proper performance of its duties and as may be from time to time appropriated for by Congress.

With the exception of the secretary, a clerk to each Commissioner, the attorneys, and such special experts and examiners as the Commission may from time to time find necessary for the conduct of its work, all employees of the Commission shall be a part of the classified civil service, and shall enter the service under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Commission and by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.

All of the expenses of the Commission, including all necessary expenses for transportation incurred by the Commissioners or by their employees under their orders, in making any investigation, or upon official business in any other places than in the city of Washington, shall be allowed and paid on the presentation of itemized vouchers therefor approved by the Commission.

Until otherwise provided by law, the Commission may rent suitable offices for its use.

The Government Accountability Office shall receive and examine all accounts of expenditures of the Commission.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1933–2018 · leading case: Freytag v. Comm'r, 501 U.S. 868 (1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Freytag v. Comm'r, 501 U.S. 868 (1991). · cites it 2× “as may be necessary"); 15 U. S. C. § 42 (Federal Trade Commission secretary); 7 U.”

PHH Corp. v. Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau, 881 F.3d 75 (D.C. Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “15 U.S.C. § 42 ; see HARRIS & MILKIS, supra, at 146, 204-05 (discussing FTC appropriations); see also Note, Independence, Congressional Weakness, and the Importance of Appointment: The Impact of Combining Budgetary Autonomy with Removal Protection, 125 HARV.”

Patrick Collins v. Steven Mnuchin, Secretar, 896 F.3d 640 (5th Cir. 2018). “248 15 U.S.C. § 42 . See generally PHH Corp. , 881 F.”

Greenfield v. Twin Vision Graphics, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.N.J. 2003). “TVG’s motion for summary judgment on Counts I (copyright infringement), II (Lanham Act), III (contract), and IV (quantum meruit) of Plaintiffs’ complaint is DENIED, except that the Court finds that Plaintiffs shall not be entitled to statutory damages or attorneys’ fees under 15…”

California Lumbermen's Council v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 115 F.2d 178 (9th Cir. 1940). “15 U.S.C.A. § 42 . The next claimed error is that appellants were prohibited from cross ex *184 amining one of the government’s witnesses as to the N.”

Exxon Corp. & Gulf Oil Corp., Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 665 F.2d 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “15 U.S.C. § 42 (1976) (originally enacted as Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, ch.”

Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Elec. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 63 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1933). “718 , § 2, 15 USCA § 42. The statute authorizes sueh examiners to administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses, and receive evidence.”

PHH Corp. v. CFPB (D.C. Cir. 2018). “15 U.S.C. § 42 ; see HARRIS & MILKIS, supra, at 146, 204-05 (discussing FTC appropriations); see also Note, Independence, Congressional Weakness, and the Importance of Appointment: The Impact of Combining Budgetary Autonomy with Removal Protection, 125 HARV.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.