15 U.S.C. § 5
Bringing in additional parties
Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any proceeding under section 4 of this title may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be summoned, whether they reside in the district in which the court is held or not; and subpoenas to that end may be served in any district by the marshal thereof.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1929–2026 · leading case: Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., 9 F.4th 392 (6th Cir. 2021).
Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., 9 F.4th 392 (6th Cir. 2021). “A few prominent examples include The Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 5 , The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.”
United States v. Armour & Co., 402 U.S. 673 (1971). “The Sherman Act ( 15 U. S. C. § 5 ) provides: "Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any proceeding under section 4 of this title may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be…”
United States v. Nat'l City Lines, Inc., 334 U.S. 573 (1948). “15 U.S.C. § 5 (1890), 15 U.S.C. § 10 (1894), 15 U.”
Laurel Gardens, LLC v. Timothy McKenna, 948 F.3d 105 (3d Cir. 2020). “§ 9 (West 1970) and Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 5 (West 1973); Howard M. Erichson, Note, Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction in All Federal Question Cases: A New Rule 4, 64 N.”
Cory v. Aztec Steel Bldg., Inc., 468 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2006). “The district court’s construction is also not in accord with antitrust legislation.”
Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd., 647 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “§ 1695 (1976) (shareholders’ suit against corporation); 15 U.S.C. §§ 5 , 25 (1976) (actions by United States to enforce the antitrust laws).”
Rolls-Royce Corp. v. Heros, Inc., 576 F. Supp. 2d 765 (N.D. Tex. 2008). “Insulating such a criminal enterprise from liability, when, for instance, the victim is unable to finance long-distance litigation, is not consistent with RICO’s purpose.”
United States v. Dish Network LLC, 256 F. Supp. 3d 810 (C.D. Ill. 2017). “' 717, 719, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 5 ; H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 1142, 63d Cong.”
Fred P. Terry, Cross-Appellant v. Raymond Int'l, Inc. v. Manitowoc Eng'g Co., Cross-Appellee, 658 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1982). “Under Rule 4, federal process can be served outside the state in which the district court sits only under an explicit provision in a federal statute, under state procedures, or under the provisions for 100-mile “bulge” service.”
Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp., 139 F.2d 871 (3d Cir. 1944). “Section 5 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 5 , and section 15 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.”
Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. Dist. Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. Dist. Judge (Two Cases), 186 F.2d 111 (3d Cir. 1951). “National City Lines was a civil suit brought by the United States, Section 5 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 5 , would have permitted the United States to bring in additional parties and he treated Section 5 as a venue statute enlarging the scope of Section 12 of…”
United States v. Gallagher, 183 F.2d 342 (3d Cir. 1950). “District and Division “Except as otherwise permitted by statute or by these rules, the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed, but if the district consists of two or more divisions the trial shall be had in a division in which the offense was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.