15 U.S.C. § 5
The Interagency Committee shall submit one year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 1984 ] a status report to the Senate and the House of Representatives describing the activities undertaken under section 4 during the preceding year. The Interagency Committee shall submit a final technical report, prepared by the Study Group, to the Senate and the House of Representatives not later than thirty months after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 1984 ]. The Interagency Committee shall provide to the Congress, within sixty days after the submission of the final technical report, any policy recommendations the Interagency Committee deems appropriate. The Interagency Committee and the Study Group shall terminate one month after submission of the policy recommendations prescribed by this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1929–2026 · leading case: Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., 9 F.4th 392 (6th Cir. 2021).
Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., 9 F.4th 392 (6th Cir. 2021). “A few prominent examples include The Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 5 , The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.”
United States v. Armour & Co., 402 U.S. 673 (1971). “The Sherman Act ( 15 U. S. C. § 5 ) provides: "Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any proceeding under section 4 of this title may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be…”
United States v. Nat'l City Lines, Inc., 334 U.S. 573 (1948). “15 U.S.C. § 5 (1890), 15 U.S.C. § 10 (1894), 15 U.”
Laurel Gardens, LLC v. Timothy McKenna, 948 F.3d 105 (3rd Cir. 2020). “§ 9 (West 1970) and Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 5 (West 1973); Howard M. Erichson, Note, Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction in All Federal Question Cases: A New Rule 4, 64 N.”
Cory v. Aztec Steel Bldg., Inc., 468 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2006). “The district court’s construction is also not in accord with antitrust legislation.”
Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd., 647 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “§ 1695 (1976) (shareholders’ suit against corporation); 15 U.S.C. §§ 5 , 25 (1976) (actions by United States to enforce the antitrust laws).”
Rolls-Royce Corp. v. Heros, Inc., 576 F. Supp. 2d 765 (N.D. Tex. 2008). “Insulating such a criminal enterprise from liability, when, for instance, the victim is unable to finance long-distance litigation, is not consistent with RICO’s purpose.”
United States v. Dish Network LLC, 256 F. Supp. 3d 810 (C.D. Ill. 2017). “' 717, 719, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 5 ; H.R. CONF. REP. NO. 1142, 63d Cong.”
Fred P. Terry, Cross-Appellant v. Raymond Int'l, Inc. v. Manitowoc Eng'g Co., Cross-Appellee, 658 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1982). “Under Rule 4, federal process can be served outside the state in which the district court sits only under an explicit provision in a federal statute, under state procedures, or under the provisions for 100-mile “bulge” service.”
Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp., 139 F.2d 871 (3rd Cir. 1944). “Section 5 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 5 , and section 15 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.”
Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. Dist. Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. Dist. Judge (Two Cases), 186 F.2d 111 (3rd Cir. 1951). “National City Lines was a civil suit brought by the United States, Section 5 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 5 , would have permitted the United States to bring in additional parties and he treated Section 5 as a venue statute enlarging the scope of Section 12 of…”
United States v. Gallagher, 183 F.2d 342 (3rd Cir. 1950). “District and Division “Except as otherwise permitted by statute or by these rules, the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed, but if the district consists of two or more divisions the trial shall be had in a division in which the offense was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.