15 U.S.C. § 6153
Federal Communications Commission do-not-call regulations
Not later than 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: Bradley (D. Maryland 2026).
Bradley (D. Maryland 2026). “15 U.S.C. § 6153 .’ The FTC regulation cited includes as an “abusive telemarking practice or act” _ and “violation of this part” a telemarketer’s 7 Curiously, in her opposition, Plaintiff modifies this statute as follows: the FCC “shall issue a final rule implementing the [Do…”
Trim v. Mayvenn, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2022). “See 15 U.S.C. § 6153 . Pursuant to said 5 directive, the FCC adopted the FTC’s NDNC Registry and amended the TCPA’s EBR 6 exemption to mirror the EBR exemption in the TSR.”
Arizona, State of v. Michael D Lansky LLC (D. Ariz. 2024). “5, 2022) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 6153 and finding TCPA’s 16 provision for business relationship (“EBR”) defense should be construed to maximize 17 consistency with the identical TSR provision).”
Tessu v. AdaptHealth, LLC (D. Maryland 2023). “15 U.S.C. § 6153 (2003). Later that year, the FCC issued an order promulgating several related rules.”
Rowan v. Us Dealer Servs., Inc. (D.N.J. 2022). “15 U.S.C. § 6153 . Final Rule”). Once an individual registers a residential or wireless telephone number on the DNC registry, TCPA regulations limit the number of telephone solicitations that can be made to that number.”
Camunas v. Nat'l Repub. Senatorial Comm. (E.D. Pa. 2021). “See 15 U.S.C. § 6153 . The legislative history of this Act provides that “[e]xemptions exist for established business relationships and tax-exempt non- profit organizations, such as those of a charitable or political nature.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.