15 U.S.C. § 63
Acquisition of stock of export trade corporation
Nothing contained in section 18 of this title shall be construed to forbid the acquisition or ownership by any corporation of the whole or any part of the stock or other capital of any corporation organized solely for the purpose of engaging in export trade, and actually engaged solely in such export trade, unless the effect of such acquisition or ownership may be to restrain trade or substantially lessen competition within the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1987–2016 · leading case: Horizons Int'l, Inc. v. Baldrige, 811 F.2d 154 (3rd Cir. 1987).
Horizons Int'l, Inc. v. Baldrige, 811 F.2d 154 (3rd Cir. 1987). “15 U.S.C. § 63 (1982). The purpose of the Webb-Pomerene Act was to encourage American exports by exempting exports from constraints which placed them at a competitive disadvantage in foreign trade.”
Third Coast Fresh Distrib., L.L.C. (A.S.B.C.A. 2016). “15 U.S.C. §§ 63 l(a), 644(a); see Rotech Healthcare Inc.”
Kabando v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014). “Plaintiff does not allege any claims based on a contract with the United States or a money- mandating constitutional provision, federal statute, or federal regulation The statutory sections that she cites, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 63 l, 637, and 656, do not mandate payment of monetary…”
Kabando v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014). “OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge On April 21, 2014, this court dismissed plaintiffs allegations that she is entitled to payment from the govemment pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 63 l, 637, and 656 for being a disadvantaged small business owner, as well as a socially and economically…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.