15 U.S.C. § 6302
Purposes
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2003–2020 · leading case: Frazier v. Turning Stone Casino, 254 F. Supp. 2d 295 (N.D.N.Y. 2003).
Frazier v. Turning Stone Casino, 254 F. Supp. 2d 295 (N.D.N.Y. 2003). “” 15 U.S.C. § 6302 . For these reasons, the Court concludes that the Professional Boxing Safety Act does not provide a basis for this Court to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this action.”
Main Events Prods., LLC v. Lacy, 358 F. Supp. 2d 391 (D.N.J. 2004). “See also 15 U.S.C. § 6302 (1) (stating that one purpose is to “improve and expand the system of safety precautions that protects the welfare of professional boxers”).”
Franklin v. Haak (E.D. Mich. 2020). “” 15 U.S.C. §6302 . It was intended to “address certain troubling business practices within the industry”, to “sanitize the boxer/manager/promoter relationship and to build public confidence in the sport of boxing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.