15 U.S.C. § 6807

Relation to State laws

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general

This subchapter and the amendments made by this subchapter shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting any statute, regulation, order, or interpretation in effect in any State, except to the extent that such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.

(b) Greater protection under State law

For purposes of this section, a State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter if the protection such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation affords any person is greater than the protection provided under this subchapter and the amendments made by this subchapter, as determined by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, after consultation with the agency or authority with jurisdiction under section 6805(a) of this title of either the person that initiated the complaint or that is the subject of the complaint, on its own motion or upon the petition of any interested party.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title V, § 507, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1442; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1093(6), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2097.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this subtitle”, meaning subtitle A (§§ 501–510) of title V of Pub. L. 106–102, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1436, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted “Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection” for “Federal Trade Commission”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2003–2016 · leading case: New York State Bar Ass'n v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 276 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D.D.C. 2003).
New York State Bar Ass'n v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 276 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D.D.C. 2003). · cites it 2× “15 U.S.C. § 6807 provides that the GLBA’s privacy provisions “shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting any statute, regulation, order, or interpretation in effect in any State, except to the extent that such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is…”
Mount v. Apao., 384 P.3d 1268 (Haw. 2016). “” 15 U.S.C.A § 6807(a). This argument lacks merit because Lovelace was obviously entitled to receive the information, as clearly acknowledged by U.”
Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Off. of the Attorney Gen., 170 Wash. 2d 418 (Wash. 2010). “” 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a); 16 C.F.R. § 313.17 (a).”
Ameriquest Mortg. v. Off. of Atty. Gen., 241 P.3d 1245 (Wash. 2010). “" 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a); 16 C.F.R. § 313.17 (a).”
Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Attorney Gen., 148 Wash. App. 145 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “¶25 The GLBA addresses preemption of state law and preserves only a state “statute, regulation, order, or interpretation” that is not “inconsistent” with GLBA 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a). 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (b).”
Ex Parte Nat'l W. Life Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 218 (Ala. 2004). “" 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a). The general prohibition in the GLBA on disclosure of nonpublic personal information is subject to certain exceptions, which, in light of the express purposes behind the GLBA, have been properly held to be "limited in scope and purpose.”
Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. State Atty. Gen., 199 P.3d 468 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “¶ 25 The GLBA addresses preemption of state law and preserves only a state "statute, regulation, order or interpretation" that is not "inconsistent" with GLBA 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a). 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (b).”
Freedom Found. v. Dep't of Transp., 276 P.3d 341 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “3d 1245 (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a) and 16 C.F.R. § 313.”
Bank of Am., NA v. City of Daly City, Cal., 279 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (N.D. Cal. 2003). “The GLBA State Law Savings Clause and the FCRA Preemption Provision Defendants further argue that State law savings clause of the GLBA, chapter 94, subchapter I, 15 U.S.C. § 6807 , protects the ordinances from preemption by the FCRA, 15 U.”
Ex Parte Nat'l W. Life Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 218 (Ala. 2004). “” 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (a). The general prohibition in the GLBA on disclosure of nonpublic personal information is subject to certain exceptions, which, in light of the express purposes behind the GLBA, have been properly held to be “limited in scope and purpose.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 6807(a) — 1 case
Mount v. Apao., 384 P.3d 1268 (Haw. 2016). “” 15 U.S.C.A § 6807(a). This argument lacks merit because Lovelace was obviously entitled to receive the information, as clearly acknowledged by U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.