15 U.S.C. § 702
DEFINITIONS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1934–1978 · leading case: Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum Corp., 71 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1934).
Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum Corp., 71 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1934). “It is the case of a legislative agent authorized to appoint a sub-agent. Congress, well knowing that the President could not personally do all that was put on him, authorized him to select some one to attend to the business instead of itself appointing such a one.”
Fletcher v. Jones, 105 F.2d 58 (D.C. Cir. 1939). “195 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 702 . The President was authorized to establish and create corporations in order effectively to carry out the proyisions of the respective acts.”
Tserpes v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 454 F. Supp. 940 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “Irving Sommer: This defendant is an Administrative Law Judge and as such invulnerable for his official acts in connection with plaintiff’s administrative case under the recent Supreme Court holding that “persons .”
Nat'l Lock Co. v. Chicago Reg'l Labor Bd., 8 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ill. 1934). “The petition further avers that the Chicago Regional Labor Board was created by executive order of the President on August 5,1933, under the power and authority vested in the President under title 1, § 2, of the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA § 702). The officers of…”
Butler v. United States, 78 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1935). “It does not require any finding by the President as a condition of his action.” The court found no standard in that act by which the President’s action was to be governed except a general declaration in section 1 (15 USCA § 701) of a policy even broader than that contained in…”
Suire v. Union Sulphur Co., 155 So. 517 (La. Ct. App. 1934). ““The Recovery Act, title 1, Industrial Recovery, section 2 (15 USCA § 702), providing for Industrial Codes, such as applies in this case, is, according to its own terms, mere emergency and temporary legislation and was enacted because of the unusual economic conditions then…”
Acme, Inc. v. Besson, 10 F. Supp. 1 (D.N.J. 1935). “” With this rule in- mind we turn to the Recovery Act and find that by its terms in section 2 (a), 15 USCA § 702 (a), the President, “To effectuate the policy of this title [chapter]” (which title has been held ineffective in Panama Refining Co.”
Richmond Hosiery Mills v. Camp, 7 F. Supp. 139 (N.D. Ga. 1934). “, and, in section 2 (15 USCA § 702), authorizes the President, in order to effectuate this policy, to accept and utilize such voluntary and uncompensated services and to appoint such officers and employees as he may find necessary.”
United States v. Schechter, 8 F. Supp. 136 (E.D.N.Y 1934). “The National Industrial Recovery Act is an emergency’measure, for a fixed period (section 2 (e) of the act, 15 USCA § 702 (c), and as such does not violate the Constitution.”
Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. Dodge, 8 F. Supp. 437 (S.D.N.Y. 1934). “” The National Industrial Recovery Act as an emergency measure is limited to two years’ duration (section 2 (c), 15 USCA § 702 (c). Aside from the purpose of the act as stated, the method by which the act seeks to lessen destructive competition and curb the predatory business…”
United States v. Kinnebrew Motor Co., 8 F. Supp. 535 (W.D. Okla. 1934). “” (15 USCA § 702.) “Sec. 3. Codes of fair competition, (a) Upon the application to the President by one or more trade or industrial associations or groups, the President may approve a code or codes of fair competition for the trade or industry or subdivision thereof, represented…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.