15 U.S.C. § 703

REPORT BY SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Study and Report.—“(1)In general.—Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 2, 1997], the Administrator shall conduct a comprehensive study and submit to the Committees a final report containing findings and recommendations of the Administrator on—“(A) the needs of small business concerns owned and controlled by eligible veterans;“(B) the availability and utilization of Administration programs by small business concerns owned and controlled by eligible veterans;“(C) the percentage, and dollar value, of Federal contracts awarded to small business concerns owned and controlled by eligible veterans in the preceding 5 fiscal years; and“(D) methods to improve Administration and other agency programs to serve the needs of small business concerns owned and controlled by eligible veterans.“(2)Contents.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include recommendations to Congress concerning the need for legislation and recommendations to the Office of Management and Budget, relevant offices within the Administration, and the Department of Veterans Affairs.“(b)Conduct of Study.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator—“(1) may conduct surveys of small business concerns owned and controlled by eligible veterans and service disabled veterans, including those who have sought financial assistance or other services from the Administration;“(2) shall consult with the appropriate committees of Congress, relevant groups and organizations in the nonprofit sector, and Federal or State government agencies; and“(3) shall have access to any information within other Federal agencies that pertains to such veterans and their small businesses, unless such access is specifically prohibited by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52 cases, 1933–2018 · leading case: United States v. ALA Schechter Poultry Corp., 76 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1935).
United States v. ALA Schechter Poultry Corp., 76 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1935). · cites it 6× “oups, to induce and maintain united action of labor and management under adequate governmental sanctions and supervision, to eliminate unfair competitive practices, to promote the fullest possible utilization of the present productive capacity of industries, to avoid undue…”
Zuckerman v. Bevin, 565 S.W.3d 580 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “195 , 196 (1933); 15 U.S.C. § 703 , also contained provisions encouraging unionization.”
Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 95 P.3d 422 (Cal. 2004). “California wine labeling regulations, federal wine labeling regulations (which, as explained below, proved to be short-lived and never became effective) were for the first time adopted in late March 1935 by the recently created Federal Alcohol Control Administration (FAC…”
Stanley v. Peabody Coal Co., 5 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Ill. 1933). · cites it 6× “2) creates the administrative agencies; section 3 (15 USCA § 703) provides for codes of fair competition; section 4 (15 USCA § 704) provides for agreements and licenses; section 5 (15 USCA § 705) suspends the provisions of the Anti-Trust Laws of the United States while the…”
Sw. Eng'g Co. v. Ernst, 291 P.2d 764 (Ariz. 1955). · cites it 2× “It does not undertake to prescribe rules of conduct to be applied to particular states of fact determined by appropriate administrative procedure. Instead of prescribing rules of conduct, it authorizes the making of codes to prescribe them.”
Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum Corp., 71 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1934). · cites it 2× “III, § 4, adopted under section 3 of the Act (15 USCA § 703) goes further than the provisions of section 9 (c) 15 USCA § 709 (c) heretofore considered because it deals directly with produetion.”
Harper v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1934). · cites it 4× “*794 That act provides for the President approving a code or codes of fair competition, for a trade or industry or subdivision thereof, upon the application to the President by one or more trade or industrial associations or groups, or, under stated conditions, upon the…”
Richmond Hosiery Mills v. Camp, 74 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1934). · cites it 2× “Section 3(f) of the act (15 USCA § 703 (f) provides that any violation of such a code shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each offense, each day the violation continues to be deemed a separate offense.”
United States v. Piatti, 416 F. Supp. 1202 (E.D.N.Y 1976). “Instead of prescribing rules of conduct, it authorizes the making of codes to prescribe them.”
Bissell Carpet Sweeper Co. v. Shane Co., Inc., 143 N.E.2d 415 (Ind. 1957). “Milk Control Board of Ind. (1936), 210 Ind. 283, 300 , 200 N.”
Edwards v. United States, 91 F.2d 767 (9th Cir. 1937). · cites it 4× “" 15 U.S.C.A. § 703 (a). Sec. 3(d). "Upon his own motion, or if complaint is made to the President that abuses inimical to the public interest and contrary to the policy herein declared are prevalent in any trade or industry or subdivision thereof, and if no code of fair…”
Franklin Tp. in Somerset Cnty., Nj v. Tugwell, 85 F.2d 208 (D.C. Cir. 1936). · cites it 4× “§ 703 ), which provided that "codes of fair competition," which should be the "standards of fair competition" for the trades and industries to which they relate, might be approved by the President upon application of representative associations of the trades or industries to be…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 703(a) — 2 cases
Richmond Hosiery Mills v. Camp, 74 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1934). “Section 3(f) of the act (15 USCA § 703 (f) provides that any violation of such a code shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each offense, each day the violation continues to be deemed a separate offense.”
Harper v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1934). “*794 That act provides for the President approving a code or codes of fair competition, for a trade or industry or subdivision thereof, upon the application to the President by one or more trade or industrial associations or groups, or, under stated conditions, upon the…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 703(b) — 1 case
United States v. James W. McAlister, Inc., 8 F. Supp. 529 (N.D. Cal. 1934).
— 15 U.S.C. § 703(c) — 1 case
United States v. James W. McAlister, Inc., 8 F. Supp. 529 (N.D. Cal. 1934).
— 15 U.S.C. § 703(e) — 1 case
United States v. Weirton Steel Co., 7 F. Supp. 255 (D. Del. 1934).
— 15 U.S.C. § 703(f) — 1 case
United States v. Kinnebrew Motor Co., 8 F. Supp. 535 (W.D. Okla. 1934).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.