15 U.S.C. § 717v

Separability

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1957–1957 · leading case: Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. of Am., & v. D. D. Harrington, & D. D. Harrington, & v. Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. of Am., &, 246 F.2d 915 (5th Cir. 1957).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. of Am., & v. D. D. Harrington, & D. D. Harrington, & v. Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. of Am., &, 246 F.2d 915 (5th Cir. 1957). “On September 9, 1952, Natural notified Panoma, Harrington’s predecessor, that it would appeal from the order and would not supersede, but (repeated with each payment) that it would pay the 9.8262 cents under protest, and would, upon success in the appeal, seek restitution for…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.