15 U.S.C. § 77zzz

Effect on existing law

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this subchapter shall affect (1) the jurisdiction of the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.] or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.] over any person, security, or contract, or (2) the rights, obligations, duties, or liabilities of any person under such acts; nor shall anything in this subchapter affect the jurisdiction of any other commission, board, agency, or officer of the United States or of any State or political subdivision of any State, over any person or security, insofar as such jurisdiction does not conflict with any provision of this subchapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1978–2002 · leading case: Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,874 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. & Jack K. Naber v. Roy I. Pring & Cent. Bank & Trust Co. of Denver, 969 F.2d 891 (1st Cir. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,874 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. & Jack K. Naber v. Roy I. Pring & Cent. Bank & Trust Co. of Denver, 969 F.2d 891 (1st Cir. 1992). “” Answer Brief of Defendant-Appellee Central Bank at 29 (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 77zzz). It is clear that in a proper case it is possible for an indenture trustee to be held liable as an aider-and-abettor.”

LNC Investments, Inc. v. First Fid. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, 935 F. Supp. 1333 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). “15 U.S.C. § 77zzz (1994). That section recognizes, and courts have held, that states may regulate trust indentures so long as such regulation does not conflict with the TIA.”

Langbein v. Kirkland, 577 F.2d 1296 (5th Cir. 1978). “§ 79u, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, 15 U.S.C. § 77zzz, and the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.”

Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. First Fid. Bank, 297 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002). · cites it 2× “To the contrary, the Trust Indenture Act expressly states that the statute will not “affect the jurisdiction * * * of any State or political subdivision of any State, over any person or security, insofar as such jurisdiction does not conflict with any provision of this title”…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.