16 U.S.C. § 1152

Prohibitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

It is unlawful, except as provided in this chapter or by regulation of the Secretary, for any person or vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to engage in the taking of fur seals in the North Pacific Ocean or on lands or waters under the jurisdiction of the United States, or to use any port or harbor or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States for any purpose connected in any way with such taking, or for any person to transport, import, offer for sale, or possess at any port or place or on any vessel, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, fur seals or the parts thereof, including, but not limited to, raw, dressed, or dyed fur seal skins, taken contrary to the provisions of this chapter or the Convention, or for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to refuse to permit, except within the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States, a duly authorized official of Canada, Japan, or Russia to board and search any vessel which is outfitted for the harvesting of living marine resources and which is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to determine whether such vessel is engaged in sealing contrary to the provisions of said Convention.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1998 · leading case: People of Togiak v. United States, 470 F. Supp. 423 (D.D.C. 1979).
People of Togiak v. United States, 470 F. Supp. 423 (D.D.C. 1979). “” The Fur Seal Act specifically permits Indians, Aleuts, and Eskimos to take and dispose of fur seals under certain circumstances ( 16 U.S.C. § 1152 (a)), and it does so, moreover, with the imprimatur of an international agreement entered into by the United States with the…”
Kanoa Inc. v. Clinton, 1 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (D. Haw. 1998). “See 16 U.S.C. § 1152 (West 1985). “Fur Seal” is defined under the act as the “North Pacific Fur Seal, Callorhinus Ursinus.”
Fouke Co. v. Mandel, 386 F. Supp. 1341 (D. Maryland 1974). “16 U.S.C. § 1152 . 21 . As noted supra at p.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.