16 U.S.C. § 1543
Construction with Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no provision of this chapter shall take precedence over any more restrictive conflicting provision of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 [16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.].
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1988–2004 · leading case: Strahan v. Coxe, 939 F. Supp. 963 (D. Mass. 1996).
Strahan v. Coxe, 939 F. Supp. 963 (D. Mass. 1996). “In particular, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in [the ESA], no provision of [the ESA] shall take precedence over any more restrictive conflicting provision of the Marine Mammal Protection Act____" 16 U.S.C.A. § 1543 (West 1995). I recognize that in correspondence with the…”
Tribal Vill. of Akutan v. Hodel, 869 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir. 1988). “Section 17 of ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1543 , states that unless otherwise provided, ESA shall be preempted by any more restrictive applicable provision of MMPA.”
UFO Chuting of Hawaii, Inc. v. Young, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1220 (D. Haw. 2004). “In the final sentence of this section, the Committee “notes” that section 17 of the ESA ( 16 U.S.C. § 1543 ) states that when there is a conflict between the ESA and the MMPA, the more restrictive provision applies.”
Tribal Vill. of Akutan v. Hodel, 859 F.2d 651 (9th Cir. 1988). “Section 17 of ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1543 , states that unless otherwise provided, ESA shall be preempted by any more restrictive applicable provision of MMPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.