The Secretary shall take such action as will assure that the development and administration of the renewable resources of the National Forest System are in full accord with the concepts for multiple use and sustained yield of products and services as set forth in the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 [16 U.S.C. 528–531]. To further these concepts, the Congress hereby sets the year 2030 as the target year when the renewable resources of the National Forest System shall be in an operating posture whereby all backlogs of needed treatment for their restoration shall be reduced to a current basis and the major portion of planned intensive multiple-use sustained-yield management procedures shall be installed and operating on an environmentally-sound basis. The annual budget shall contain requests for funds for an orderly program to eliminate such backlogs: Provided, That when the Secretary finds that (1) the backlog of areas that will benefit by such treatment has been eliminated, (2) the cost of treating the remainder of such area exceeds the economic and environmental benefits to be secured from their treatment, or (3) the total supplies of the renewable resources of the United States are adequate to meet the future needs of the American people, the budget request for these elements of restoration may be adjusted accordingly.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases, 1997–2010 · leading case:
Se. Conf. v. Vilsack, 684 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2010).
Se. Conf. v. Vilsack, 684 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.D.C. 2010).
“2 (quoting 16 U.S.C. § 1607 ). As part of its management of national forests, the Forest Service must “revise[] from time to time [its forest plans] when the Secretary [of Agriculture] finds conditions in a unit have significantly changed, but at least every fifteen years.”
The Lands Council v. Powell, 395 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2005).
“” 16 U.S.C. § 1607 . The Forest Service is obligated to balance competing demands on national forests, including timber harvesting, recreational use, and environmental preservation.”
Wiley v. Earl's Pawn & Jewelry, Inc., 950 F. Supp. 1108 (S.D. Ala. 1997).
“Instead, those cases arise from 16 U.S.C. § 1607 which authorizes administrative enforcement of TILA by government agencies such as the FDIC and the OTS.”
Lands Council v. Powell, 379 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2004).
“” 16 U.S.C. § 1607 . The Forest Service is obligated to balance competing demands on national forests, including timber harvesting, recreational use, and environmental preservation.”
Sierra Club v. Martin, 992 F. Supp. 1448 (N.D. Ga. 1998).
“See also 16 U.S.C. § 1607 . The Act provided that the Forest Service would develop national forest system land and resource management plans for each unit of the national forest system.”
Se. Conf. v. Schaefer (D.D.C. 2010).
“2 (quoting 16 U.S.C. § 1607 ). As part of its management of national forests, the Forest Service must "revise[] from time to time [its forest plans] when the Secretary [of -2- Agriculture] finds conditions in a unit have significantly changed, but at least every fifteen years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.