16 U.S.C. § 17
Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2011–2014 · leading case: Winding Creek Solar LLC v. California Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 15 F. Supp. 3d 965 (N.D. Cal. 2014).
Winding Creek Solar LLC v. California Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 15 F. Supp. 3d 965 (N.D. Cal. 2014). “” 16 U.S.C. § 17 (A). It goes on to define a “qualifying small power production facility” as a “facility that the Commission determines, by rule, meets such requirements (including requirements respecting fuel use, fuel efficiency, and reliability) as the Commission may, by…”
Conservation Force v. Salazar (D.D.C. 2011). “Allowing for the ESA’s 60-day notice requirement, see 16 U.S.C. § 17 18 1540(g)(2)(C), plaintiffs could have maintained their suit on May 4, 2000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.