16 U.S.C. § 17b

Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1968–2008 · leading case: Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 393 U.S. 186 (1968).
Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 393 U.S. 186 (1968). · cites it 4× “382 , 16 U. S. C. § 17b. Moreover, he is "to encourage and enable private persons and corporations .”
United States v. Dist. of Columbia, Dist. of Columbia v. Landmark Servs., Inc., 571 F.2d 651 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “The Secretary is empowered under 16 U.S.C. § 17b to “contract for services .”
United States v. Carter, 339 F. Supp. 1394 (D. Ariz. 1972). “§ 3 (1916); 16 U. S.C. § 17b (1930). The courts interpreted this language to give the Secretary the right to let contracts to concessions and to exclude all other competition from the park area, whether the service provided concerned the land [Robbins v.”
Summer's Best Two Weeks v. Dep't of Conservation & Nat. Resources of the Commonwealth, 954 A.2d 94 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “He was also given the power to let contracts to responsible individuals or corporations to provide the services he felt were necessary to carry out that purpose.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.