16 U.S.C. § 420
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1983–1996 · leading case: Tele-Commc'ns of Key West, Inc. v. United States of Am., 757 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
Tele-Commc'ns of Key West, Inc. v. United States of Am., 757 F.2d 1330 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “See 16 U.S.C. § 420 (1982); 43 U.S.C. § 961 (1982).”
Terry S. Ward v. Resolution Trust Corp., 996 F.2d 99 (5th Cir. 1993). “1993), relied on § 18210) in *103 refusing to enjoin the sale of an historic building despite the sale's violation of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 420 et seq. 9 . Gross, 974 F.”
Tele-Commc'ns of Key West, Inc. v. United States, 580 F. Supp. 11 (D.D.C. 1983). “3 The statute, which was clearly intended to grant certain powers to department heads and not to confer rights of access to particular individuals, does not require the department head to grant § 420 easements to all citizens, associations, or corporations; rather it allows a…”
Ward v. Resolution Trust Corp. (5th Cir. 1993). “May 28, 1993), relied on § 1821(j) in refusing to enjoin the sale of an historic building despite the sale's violation of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 420 et seq. 9 Gross, 974 F.2d at 408.”
In re the Dep't of Def. Cable Television Franchise Agreements, 36 Fed. Cl. 171 (Fed. Cl. 1996). “The government is correct that the federal rights-of-way statutes, 16 U.S.C. § 420 and 43 U.S.C. § 961 , and the government’s traditional prerogative to control access to its own property, are the sources of at least a part of the authority needed to- enter into franchise…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.