Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2022 · leading case:
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
· cites it 3× “612 (1972) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa to 460aa-14 (1982)), and known as the Sawtooth Act, which foreclosed plaintiff from patenting his claims, effected a taking of those claims, requiring payment of just compensation.”
Swanson v. Babbitt, 3 F.3d 1348 (9th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 2× “TROTT, Circuit Judge: The major issue presented by this case is whether the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et seq., preclude the issuance of mill site patents, even though the patent applications for those sites were pending at the…”
Louis F. Racine v. United States Dept. Of Agric. John R. Block, 858 F.2d 506 (9th Cir. 1988).
“” 16 U.S.C. § 460aa (1982). Congress authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to acquire “scenic easements” from private owners of land within the SNRA in order to assure the protection and preservation of scenic values within the SNRA.”
Fred R. Stewart & v. United States, 620 F.2d 740 (9th Cir. 1980).
“PER CURIAM: In 1974, when Congress enacted legislation establishing the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa, et seq., (the Act), it provided a six-month statute of limitations for facial challenges to administrative regulations implementing the Act.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 3× “612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq.). Pri- or to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
Furey v. United States, 61 F. App'x 399 (9th Cir. 2003).
· cites it 2× “§ 4321 , by failing to take the required “hard look” at the environmental consequences and by making a final decision before the Environmental Assessment (“EA”) was completed; (2) violated the Act establishing the SNRA (“SNRA Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460aa, and regulations enacted…”
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Serv., No. 1:19-cv-00118 (D. Idaho June 12, 2020).
“On April 9, 2019, two months prior to the commencement of trail construction, Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et. seq. (“SNRA Act”); the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.”
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Serv., No. 1:19-cv-00118 (D. Idaho June 30, 2020).
“PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed a complaint on April 9, 2019, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et. seq. (“SNRA Act”); the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 3× “612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq. ). Prior to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460aa(a): 3 cases
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“612 (1972) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa to 460aa-14 (1982)), and known as the Sawtooth Act, which foreclosed plaintiff from patenting his claims, effected a taking of those claims, requiring payment of just compensation.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
“612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq.). Pri- or to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
“612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq. ). Prior to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.