U.S. Code
»
Title 16
» Chapter CHAPTER 1— NATIONAL PARKS, MILITARY PARKS, MONUMENTS, AND SEASHORES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER LXXXV— SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
16 U.S.C. § 460aa
Establishment
(a) In generalIn order to assure the preservation and protection of the natural, scenic, historic, pastoral, and fish and wildlife values and to provide for the enhancement of the recreational values associated therewith, the Sawtooth National Recreation Area is hereby established.
(b) Boundaries; publication in Federal RegisterThe Sawtooth National Recreation Area (hereafter referred to as the “recreation area”), including the Sawtooth Wilderness Area (hereafter referred to as the “wilderness area”), shall comprise the lands generally depicted on the map entitled “Sawtooth National Recreation Area” dated June 1972, which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the office of the Chief, Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. The Secretary of Agriculture (hereafter referred to as the “Secretary”) shall, as soon as practicable after August 22, 1972, publish a detailed description and map showing the boundaries of the recreation area in the Federal Register.
(Pub. L. 92–400, § 1, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 612.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2022 · leading case:
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
· cites it 3× “612 (1972) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa to 460aa-14 (1982)), and known as the Sawtooth Act, which foreclosed plaintiff from patenting his claims, effected a taking of those claims, requiring payment of just compensation.”
Swanson v. Babbitt, 3 F.3d 1348 (9th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 2× “TROTT, Circuit Judge: The major issue presented by this case is whether the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et seq., preclude the issuance of mill site patents, even though the patent applications for those sites were pending at the…”
Fred R. Stewart, Et Ux. & v. The United States of Am., 620 F.2d 740 (9th Cir. 1980).
“PER CURIAM: In 1974, when Congress enacted legislation establishing the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa, et seq., (the Act), it provided a six-month statute of limitations for facial challenges to administrative regulations implementing the Act.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 3× “612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq.). Pri- or to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
Furey v. United States, 61 F. App'x 399 (9th Cir. 2003).
· cites it 2× “§ 4321 , by failing to take the required “hard look” at the environmental consequences and by making a final decision before the Environmental Assessment (“EA”) was completed; (2) violated the Act establishing the SNRA (“SNRA Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460aa, and regulations enacted…”
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Serv. (D. Idaho 2020).
“On April 9, 2019, two months prior to the commencement of trail construction, Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et. seq. (“SNRA Act”); the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.”
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Serv. (D. Idaho 2020).
“PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed a complaint on April 9, 2019, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et. seq. (“SNRA Act”); the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 3× “612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq. ). Prior to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 460aa(a) — 3 cases
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“612 (1972) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa to 460aa-14 (1982)), and known as the Sawtooth Act, which foreclosed plaintiff from patenting his claims, effected a taking of those claims, requiring payment of just compensation.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
“612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq.). Pri- or to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
“612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq. ). Prior to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.