U.S. Code
»
Title 16
» Chapter CHAPTER 1— NATIONAL PARKS, MILITARY PARKS, MONUMENTS, AND SEASHORES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER LXXXV— SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2022 · leading case:
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
· cites it 3× “612 (1972) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa to 460aa-14 (1982)), and known as the Sawtooth Act, which foreclosed plaintiff from patenting his claims, effected a taking of those claims, requiring payment of just compensation.”
Swanson v. Babbitt, 3 F.3d 1348 (9th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 2× “TROTT, Circuit Judge: The major issue presented by this case is whether the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et seq., preclude the issuance of mill site patents, even though the patent applications for those sites were pending at the…”
Fred R. Stewart, Et Ux. & v. The United States of Am., 620 F.2d 740 (9th Cir. 1980).
“PER CURIAM: In 1974, when Congress enacted legislation establishing the Sawtooth National Recreation Area, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa, et seq., (the Act), it provided a six-month statute of limitations for facial challenges to administrative regulations implementing the Act.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 3× “612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq.). Pri- or to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
Furey v. United States, 61 F. App'x 399 (9th Cir. 2003).
· cites it 2× “§ 4321 , by failing to take the required “hard look” at the environmental consequences and by making a final decision before the Environmental Assessment (“EA”) was completed; (2) violated the Act establishing the SNRA (“SNRA Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460aa, and regulations enacted…”
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Serv., No. 1:19-cv-00118 (D. Idaho June 12, 2020).
“On April 9, 2019, two months prior to the commencement of trail construction, Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et. seq. (“SNRA Act”); the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.”
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch LLC v. United States Forest Serv., No. 1:19-cv-00118 (D. Idaho June 30, 2020).
“PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed a complaint on April 9, 2019, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et. seq. (“SNRA Act”); the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 3× “612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq. ). Prior to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460aa(a): 3 cases
Freese v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“612 (1972) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa to 460aa-14 (1982)), and known as the Sawtooth Act, which foreclosed plaintiff from patenting his claims, effected a taking of those claims, requiring payment of just compensation.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
“612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq.). Pri- or to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
State v. United States, 12 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2000).
“612 , (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 460aa et seq. ). Prior to its adoption, the Act was intended to create two entirely separate land units, a wilderness area and a recreation area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.